Background and aim Left ventricular thrombus is a frequent complication of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure with severely depressed ejection fraction. Once diagnosed, anticoagulation for up to 6-months is recommended, but clinical experience with direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) is limited to a few case reports. Our aim is to test DOAC LV thrombus resolution efficacy against warfarin. Methods Single-centre retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with recently diagnosed LV thrombus, either after acute myocardial infarction or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, from January 2009 till December 2018. Thrombus diagnosis and subsequent assessments were performed with echocardiography and complemented with cardiac magnetic resonance, when appropriate. Decisions regarding the type, dose and duration of anticoagulation and any concomitant antiplatelet therapy were left to physician's judgement. Results In a population of 66 patients (51 male, mean age 69±12 years), 13 received DOAC therapy, with the remainder receiving vit. K antagonists. One from each group was lost to follow up. The DOAC subgroup had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher left ventricular end-diastolic volumes and worse wall motion severity score index (WMSI). The duration of anticoagulant therapy, concomitant single or dual antiplatelet therapy and overall follow up were similar between strategies. Thrombus remission was observed in 91.7% (n=11) and 59.6% (n=31) patients within DOAC and warfarin group, respectively. Risk of unsuccessful resolution was reduced by 35% relative to the warfarin group (RR 0.65; 95% CI [0.491–0.862]; p-value 0.035) (figure). figure Conclusion DOAC seems to be an effective alternative to vitamin-K antagonists in patients with LV thrombus.

BACKGROUND Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction evolved since trials validated the use of implantable cardioverter–defibrillators ( ICD s). We sought to evaluate the performance of ICD s in reducing mortality in the era of modern medical therapy by means of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials of drug therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS We systematically identified randomized clinical trials that evaluated drug therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction that reported mortality. Studies that enrolled <1000 patients, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, or patients in the acute phase of heart failure and study treatment with devices were excluded. We identified 8 randomized clinical trials, including 31 701 patients of whom 3631 (11.5%) had an ICD . ICDs were associated with a lower risk of all‐cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78–0.94) and sudden cardiac death (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40–0.61). Results were consistent among studies published before and after 2010. In meta‐regression analysis, the proportion of nonischemic etiology did not affect the associated benefit of ICD . CONCLUSIONS In our meta‐analysis of contemporary randomized trials of drug therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the rate of ICD use was low and associated with a decreased risk in both all‐cause mortality and sudden cardiac death. This benefit was still present in trials with new medical therapy.

No abstract

No abstract