PurposeTo evaluate predictive factors for PSA bounce after 125I permanent seed prostate brachytherapy and identify criteria that distinguish between benign bounces and biochemical relapses.Materials and methodsMen treated with exclusive permanent 125I seed brachytherapy from November 1999, with at least a 36 months follow-up were included. Bounce was defined as an increase ≥ 0.2 ng/ml above the nadir, followed by a spontaneous return to the nadir. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined using the criteria of the Phoenix conference: nadir +2 ng/ml.Results198 men were included. After a median follow-up of 63.9 months, 21 patients experienced a BF, and 35.9% had at least one bounce which occurred after a median period of 17 months after implantation (4-50). Bounce amplitude was 0.6 ng/ml (0.2-5.1), and duration was 13.6 months (4.0-44.9). In 12.5%, bounce magnitude exceeded the threshold defining BF. Age at the time of treatment and high PSA level assessed at 6 weeks were significantly correlated with bounce but not with BF. Bounce patients had a higher BF free survival than the others (100% versus 92%, p = 0,007). In case of PSA increase, PSA doubling time and velocity were not significantly different between bounce and BF patients. Bounces occurred significantly earlier than relapses and than nadir + 0.2 ng/ml in BF patients (17 vs 27.8 months, p < 0.0001).ConclusionHigh PSA value assessed 6 weeks after brachytherapy and young age were significantly associated to a higher risk of bounces but not to BF. Long delays between brachytherapy and PSA increase are more indicative of BF.

For prostate cancer patients, VMAT treatment plans obtained with Monaco and Pinnacle offered clinically acceptable dose distributions. Further investigations are in progress to confirm the performances of the two TPS for irradiating more complex volumes.

No abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and tumor outcome of re-irradiation with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for macroscopic local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by adjuvant or salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2018, five men with histologically proven local failure within the prostate (4) or seminal vesicle bed (1) after RP and adjuvant or salvage EBRT (median dose: 67.5 Gy) underwent a salvage brachytherapy (S-BT). The median delay after EBRT was 86 months (range 75e234). Two patients were castration-resistant at the time of S-BT. The gross tumor volume was defined on a multiparametric MRI and transrectal US imaging. Echoguided transperineal implants of Iodine-125 seeds were optimized with a per-operative dosimetry and delivered with the seed-selectron. RESULTS: A high conformity was achieved with a high dose to the CTV (D 95% O 145 Gy in all but one) and very low dose to the rectum, urethra, and bladder. With a median followup of 21 months, all but one patient experienced nodes and/or bone metastases. Local control was achieved in 3/4 of evaluable patients (local failure distant to the treated volume in one). To date, no Grade 2 or more late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: For selected patients, focal local recurrence brachytherapy after PR and EBRT appears technically feasible and safe, but the efficacy remains uncertain as the majority of patients quickly relapsed at other sites. Large prospective studies are still required to better select patients who will benefit from this strategy.

No abstract