Erectile dysfunction is a common complication of spinal cord injury. This double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐way crossover study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction caused by traumatic spinal cord injury. A total of 178 men (mean age, 38 years) received placebo or sildenafil 1 hour before sexual activity for 6 weeks; after a 2‐week washout period, the men received the alternate treatment for 6 weeks. The 50‐mg starting dose could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was assessed by using global efficacy questions, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and a patient log of erectile activity. Of 143 men with residual erectile function at baseline, 111 (78%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men (including those who reported no residual erectile function at baseline), 127 of 168 (76%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men, 132 of 166 (80%) reported that sildenafil improved sexual intercourse compared with 17 of 166 men (10%) reporting improvement with placebo. IIEF questions assessing the ability to achieve and maintain erections and satisfaction with sexual intercourse demonstrated significant improvement with sildenafil. Sildenafil was well tolerated, with a low rate of discontinuation because of treatment‐related adverse events (2% vs 1% for placebo). Oral sildenafil is an effective and well‐tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol 1999;46:15–21

Vardenafil significantly improved erectile and ejaculatory function and was generally well tolerated in men with erectile dysfunction due to spinal cord injury.

Despite availability of outcome measures and scales for assessing erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment efficacy, guidelines are not available for assessing broader therapeutic outcomes or defining treatment failure in ED. An International Consensus Advisory Panel was convened to develop guidelines, definitions and a new algorithm for evaluating treatment effectiveness in ED. These new guidelines are recommended for use in both research and clinical practice. A multidisciplinary, international panel, consisting of 11 senior researchers and clinicians, was convened to address pertinent issues concerning therapeutic outcome assessment for ED. The panel utilized a modified Delphi method of consensus development and proposed a new model for outcomes assessment. This model is inherently testable, using existing instruments and current methods of assessment. Following a comprehensive literature review and discussion, the Panel recommended adoption of a new treatment effectiveness conceptual framework or theoretical model for assessing therapeutic outcomes in ED. Treatment effectiveness is presumed to be a combined function of two other factors, treatment response and treatment satisfaction. Treatment response is based on the combined assessment of efficacy and tolerability, and treatment satisfaction on the combined assessment of patient and partner satisfaction. Taken together, these two domains define an overall domain of treatment effectiveness. This therapeutic index would be derived by independently assessing treatment efficacy and satisfaction by means of event logs, questionnaires or the more typical patient interview methods. In conclusion, the Ad Hoc Advisory Consensus Panel recommends adoption of a new framework or conceptual model for conducting ED outcome trials or clinical research. The concept of 'treatment effectiveness' is proposed as a new 'umbrella concept' or distal outcome to be evaluated.

No abstract