Carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus) seed crops in Oregon and Washington were surveyed in 2001-02 and 2002-03 for development of Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae, causal agent of bacterial blight. For each state and season, 20 plants were sampled from each of 7 to 12 direct-seeded crops twice in the fall or winter and three times from spring to summer; and from each of 2 to 4 steckling (root-to-seed) crops three times from spring to summer. X. campestris pv. carotae was detected in 1 of 15 and 6 of 32 stock seed lots planted in the fall in Oregon and Washington, respectively, and in 2 of 6 steckling shipments planted in each state in the spring. The pathogen was detected at 102 to 108 CFU/g foliage in 1 of 22 and 10 of 14 direct-seeded crops within 2 months of planting in 2001 and 2002, respectively. The prevalence of X. campestris pv. carotae then increased through the season in most seed crops, although bacterial blight symptoms were not observed until April in Oregon and July in Washington in both seasons. In August 2002 and 2003, X. campestris pv. carotae was detected in all 10 and 13 crops surveyed in Oregon, respectively; and in 11 of 12 and 7 of 10 crops in Washington, respectively. The pathogen was typically less prevalent in steckling versus direct-seeded crops. X. campestris pv. carotae was detected in 20 of 22 and 19 of 23 harvested seed lots in Oregon and Washington, respectively, at populations ranging from 1.3 × 101 to 1.4 × 108 CFU/g seed. Airborne X. campestris pv. carotae, detected ≤1,600 m downwind of crops being threshed in Oregon in September of 2003 and 2004, may provide a source of inoculum for newly planted seed crops between overlapping biennial seasons for carrot seed production. Despite the prevalence of this pathogen in the Pacific Northwest, carrot seed lots free of X. campestris pv. carotae were detected, demonstrating the ability to produce clean seed in this region by adhering to recommended practices for management of bacterial blight.
Open‐field burning provides effective, economical post‐harvest residue management in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) seed crops, but public concern over air quality necessitates the identification of nonthermal management strategies. On‐farm trials were conducted in Oregon's Grande Ronde Valley to investigate the effect of nonthermal management in two cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass on crop regrowth, seed yield, and seed quality. Residue treatments imposed after the first, second, and third seed harvests included (i) removal of straw by baling (Bale), (ii) baling, flailing with a rotary scythe, followed by residue removal with a needle‐nose rake (Rake), (iii) baling, followed by removal of the residue by vacuum‐sweeper (Vacuum), (iv) flail‐chopping residue three times with no removal (Flail 3X), and (v) open‐field burning (Burn). Tillers were etiolated at the cessation of fall regrowth in Flail 3X (stubble height reduced, no straw removal) and Bale (no stubble height reduction, 75% straw removal) treatments. Fertile tiller number was lower in the following spring with Flail 3X and Bale treatments compared with Burn. Seed yield averaged across the 3‐yr period was reduced 38% when managed with Flail 3X and 10% when managed with Bale compared with Burn. Crop regrowth, fertile tiller production, and seed yield resulting from Rake and Vacuum treatments were equivalent to the Burn treatment. Rake and Vacuum treatments reduced stubble height and removed at least 90% of the straw. High seed yield and seed quality can be maintained in Kentucky bluegrass without open‐field burning when straw removal is thorough and stubble height is reduced prior to crop regrowth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.