The supply of oxygen within three-dimensional tissue-engineered (TE) cartilage polymer constructs is mainly by diffusion. Oxygen consumption by cells results in gradients in the oxygen concentration. The aims of this study were, firstly, to identify the gradients within TE cartilage polymer constructs and, secondly, to predict the profiles during in vitro culture. A glass microelectrode system was adapted and used to penetrate cartilage and TE cartilaginous constructs, yielding reproducible measurements with high spatial resolution. Cartilage polymer constructs were cultured for up to 41 days in vitro. Oxygen concentrations, as low as 2-5%, were measured within the center of these constructs. At the beginning of in vitro culture, the oxygen gradients were steeper in TE constructs in comparison to native tissue. Nevertheless, during the course of culture, oxygen concentrations approached the values measured in native tissue. A mathematical model was developed which yields oxygen profiles within cartilage explants and TE constructs. Model input parameters were assessed, including the diffusion coefficient of cartilage (2.2 x 10(-9)) + (0.4 x 10(-9) m(2) s(-1)), 70% of the diffusion coefficient of water and the diffusion coefficient of constructs (3.8 x 10(-10) m(2) s(-1)). The model confirmed that chondrocytes in polymer constructs cultured for 27 days have low oxygen requirements (0.8 x 10(-19) mol m(-3) s(-1)), even lower than chondrocytes in native cartilage. The ability to measure and predict local oxygen tensions offers new opportunities to obtain more insight in the relation between oxygen tension and chondrogenesis.

Hyaluronan is a polysaccharide with multiple functions in the human body being involved in creating flexible and protective layers in tissues and in many signalling pathways during embryonic development, wound healing, inflammation, and cancer. Hyaluronan is an important component of active pharmaceutical ingredients for treatment of, for example, arthritis and osteoarthritis, and its commercial value far exceeds that of other microbial extracellular polysaccharides. Traditionally hyaluronan is extracted from animal waste which is a well-established process now. However, biotechnological synthesis of biopolymers provides a wealth of new possibilities. Therefore, genetic/metabolic engineering has been applied in the area of tailor-made hyaluronan synthesis. Another approach is the controlled artificial (in vitro) synthesis of hyaluronan by enzymes. Advantage of using microbial and enzymatic synthesis for hyaluronan production is the simpler downstream processing and a reduced risk of viral contamination. In this paper an overview of the different methods used to produce hyaluronan is presented. Emphasis is on the advancements made in the field of the synthesis of bioengineered hyaluronan.

No abstract

In vertebrates and bacteria, heparosan the precursor of heparin is synthesized by glycosyltransferases via the stepwise addition of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine and UDP-glucuronic acid. As heparin-like molecules represent a great interest in the pharmaceutical area, the cryptic Pasteurella multocida heparosan synthase PmHS2 found to catalyze heparosan synthesis using substrate analogs has been studied. In this paper, we report an efficient way to purify PmHS2 and to maintain its activity stable during 6 months storage at −80 °C using His-tag purification and a desalting step. In the presence of 1 mM of each nucleotide sugar, purified PmHS2 synthesized polymers up to an average molecular weight of 130 kDa. With 5 mM of UDP-GlcUA and 5 mM of UDP-GlcNAc, an optimal specific activity, from 3 to 6 h of incubation, was found to be about 0.145 nmol/μg/min, and polymers up to an average of 102 kDa were synthesized in 24 h. In this study, we show that the chain length distribution of heparosan polymers can be controlled by change of the initial nucleotide sugar concentration. It was observed that low substrate concentration favors the formation of high molecular weight heparosan polymer with a low polydispersity while high substrate concentration did the opposite. Similarities in the polymerization mechanism between PmHS2, PmHS1, and PmHAS are discussed.