Current tests for plane stress characterization of fracture in automotive sheet metals include simple shear, uniaxial, plane strain, and biaxial tension, but there is a significant gap between shear and uniaxial tension. Presently, it remains uncertain whether the fracture strain experiences a reduction between simple shear and uniaxial tension or undergoes an exponential increase as the triaxiality decreases. Fracture in combined simple shear and tension is complicated by premature edge cracking in tension along with a strong sensitivity of fracture strain to the measurement lengthscale. To address these issues, several existing simple shear geometries were modified and evaluated, with a focus on obtaining approximately linear strain paths corresponding to combined uniaxial tension and simple shear suitable for experimental fracture characterization using digital image correlation (DIC). An experimental and numerical investigation was conducted using two planar geometries that do not require through-thickness machining and can be easily tested on a universal test frame. Finite-element analysis was used to investigate the influence of the notch eccentricity on the stress state and predicted fracture location. The most promising geometry in each coupon type was then selected and tested for a dual-phase advanced high-strength steel, DP1180. The performance of the two planar geometries was evaluated based on the linearity of strain and stress state, along with the location of fracture initiation. The best geometry was then used to evaluate and recalibrate the modified Mohr-Coulomb (MMC) fracture locus with data in combined shear and tension. The initial MMC calibration using four fracture tests that suppressed necking provided an accurate estimate for the fracture strain in combined uniaxial tension and simple shear. The MMC model correctly predicted a valley in the fracture strain between these two loading conditions.
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The superior formability and local ductility of the emerging class of third generation of advanced high-strength steels (3rd Gen AHSS) compared to their conventional counterparts of the same strength level offer significant advantages for automotive lightweighting and enhanced crash performance. Nevertheless, studies on the material behavior of 3rd Gen AHSS have been limited and there is some uncertainty surrounding the applicability of developed methodologies for conventional dual-phase (DP) steels to this new class of AHSS. The present paper provides a comprehensive study on the quasi-static and dynamic constitutive behavior, formability characterization and prediction, and the fracture behavior of two commercial 3rd Gen AHSS with an ultimate strength of 1180 MPa that will be contrasted with a conventional DP1180. The hardening response to large strain levels was determined experimentally using tensile and shear tests and then validated with 3-D simulations of tensile tests. In general, the strain rate sensitivity of the two 3rd Gen AHSS was significantly different as one grade exhibited larger transformation-induced behavior. The in-plane formability of the three 1180 MPa steels determined using Marciniak tests was similar but with a stark contrast in the local formability for the 3rd Gen AHSS. The forming limit curves could be accurately predicted using the experimentally measured hardening behaviour and the modified Bressan-Williams through-thickness shear model. An efficient experimental approach to fracture characterization for AHSS was developed that exploits tool contact and bending to obtain fracture strains on the surface of the specimen by suppressing necking. Miniature conical hole expansion and biaxial punch tests are used along with the VDA 238-100 bend test.</div></div>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.