The effect of glibenclamide treatment on insulin-mediated glucose disposal was studied in eight C-peptide-negative type I diabetic patients. The patients were studied twice by the euglycemic insulin clamp technique. One of the two experiments was preceded by glibenclamide treatment at the dose of 5 mg, three times daily for 15 days; half of the patients had the first test before and the second test after sulfonylurea treatment, and vice versa. Insulin was infused for four periods of 2 h each sequentially at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mU kg-1 min-1; for each insulin infusion period, the steady state plasma free insulin levels were comparable with or without glibenclamide. The mean +/- SEM plasma glucose concentration was 88 +/- 2 mg/dl in both experiments. The insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate was greater with glibenclamide during the first insulin infusion period (which generated plasma free insulin levels within the physiological range) 2.68 +/- 0.32 mg kg-1 min-1 with glibenclamide vs. 1.97 +/- 0.20 mg kg-1 min-1 without glibenclamide (P less than 0.005). However, glucose disposal rates did not differ in the diabetic patients with or without glibenclamide treatment during the second, third, and fourth insulin infusion periods, which generated plasma free insulin levels in the supraphysiological range. These results provide evidence for an extrapancreatic effect of glibenclamide at low insulin concentrations during euglycemic clamping in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. However, this effect was not reflected clinically in either an increased rate of hypoglycemic reactions or decreased insulin needs during the short term period of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.