No abstract

Pattern reversal, brain stem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials (PREPs, BAEPs, SEPs) have been recorded on 13 patients occupationally exposed to inorganic lead compounds, in 9 patients occupationally or accidentally exposed to inorganic mercury compounds and in 26 chronic alcoholics. The results were compared to those of a normal control group. Peripheral conduction velocities were decreased in lead exposed workers and in alcoholics, but not modified in the mercury exposed patients. In the three exposed groups, an amplitude increase (PREPs and upper limb SEP cortical components), more important in the mercury group and an increase of central conduction time in case of lower limb stimulation, could be interpreted as early signs of nervous cortical impairment.

Modifications with aging in heart rate reactivity was investigated during minor mental stress. 27 normal male volunteers, aged 51–55 years (n = 10) and 71–74 years (n = 17), were studied in control conditions and while passing a series of 5 psychometric test measuring memory or intellectual speed. Men in their 70s had both lower heart rate baseline levels and lower reactivity during cognitive tasks.

Recording of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) enables monitoring of spinal cord function. We studied the effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide or midazolam during sufentanil anaesthesia on CSEP monitoring during major spinal surgery. Thirty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to one of the following anaesthesia regimens: propofol (2.5 mg kg-1 followed by 10-6 mg kg-1 h-1) with or without nitrous oxide, or midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1 followed by 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1) combined with sufentanil 0.5 microgram kg-1 h-1 in the propofol and midazolam groups, or 0.25 microgram kg-1 h-1 in the propofol-nitrous oxide group. CSEP were elicited by alternate right and left tibial posterior nerve stimulation and recorded before and after induction (15 min, 1, 2 and 3 h), and during skin closure. CSEP latencies were not significantly modified in the three groups. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly in the propofol-nitrous oxide group (from mean 2.0 (SEM 0.3) to 0.6 (0.1) microV; P < 0.05) but not in the propofol (from 1.8 (0.6) to 2.2 (0.3) microV) or midazolam (1.7 (0.5) to 1.6 (0.5) microV) groups. The time to the first postoperative voluntary motor response (recovery) delay was significantly greater in the midazolam group (115 (19) min) compared with the propofol and propofol-nitrous oxide groups (43 (8) and 41 (3) min, respectively). Consequently, the use of propofol without nitrous oxide can be recommended during spinal surgery when CSEP monitoring is required.