One hundred twenty-four patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix were examined with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before treatment. Since surgery preceded any other kind of therapy, sonographic findings could be compared with the surgical pathologic stage. The accuracy of staging with TRUS was 83%, compared with an accuracy of 78% for clinical staging performed according to the criteria of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). For extent of parametrial involvement, the sensitivity of TRUS evaluation was 78%, with a specificity of 89% and a diagnostic accuracy of 87%. The same reliability parameters for clinical evaluation were 52%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. From these data and from analysis of the cases--in which a discrepancy between clinical and TRUS staging was observed--it can be concluded that TRUS could be usefully applied to routine pretreatment evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.