Background Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student‐ and trainee‐led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre‐specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. Results A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57–75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1–3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non‐selective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Conclusion NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

A 66-year-old woman presented in October 2011 with bilateral visual failure of subacute onset. She has Rheumatoid Arthritis, treated with methotrexate (since 2002), etanercept (2003–2009). A right knee replacement was revised and underwent 6 washouts for persistent infection. Antibiotics included vancomycin, amoxicillin, and daptomycin. Chloramphenicol 4 g daily was started in June 2011 (14 weeks before visual loss). 10 days after onset of visual loss she had visual acuity of 3/24 (Snellen) bilaterally, hyperaemic optic discs and centrocaecal scotomas. The control Ishihara plate could not be read. Toxic optic neuropathy secondary to chloramphenicol was suspected; chloramphenicol had been stopped on Day 6 of visual symptoms. 4 weeks after stopping chloramphenicol acuity was 6/5 (right), 6/6 (left) and visual fields normal, but Ishihara colour plates impaired at 8/13 bilaterally. At the onset of visual symptoms she developed paraesthesiae of limbs which also improved. Examination showed L5 dermatomal loss to pinprick and abnormal proprioception at the toes. From 1950 to 1988 approximately 40 cases of chloramphenicol optic neuropathy were reported, but only two in the past 12 years. This case highlights the potential pitfalls of older generation antibiotics and unfamiliar adverse effects. This may become more pertinent as antibiotic resistance increase.