Living donor and split-liver transplantation techniques require the calculation of a standard liver volume (SLV) as a reference point for the minimal volume necessary for the recipient. We therefore examined whether a widely used formula developed on the basis of a Japanese population sample was also adequate for the Caucasian population. The documentation of volumes of 1332 autopsy livers from a German Forensic Medicine Department was used to create a formula for an SLV for the Caucasian population. The Japanese formula estimated the Caucasian liver volume to be on average 322.6 ؎ 335.8 g (SD) less than they actually were. The following new formula for the calculation of SLV for Caucasians was established by linear regression analysis:Liver volume (mL) ‫؍‬ 1072.8 ‫ء‬ body surface area (m 2 ) ؊ 345.7

We tested the diagnostic validity of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) as an indicator for relapse into elevated alcohol consumption among patients who were examined under follow-up treatment before (n = 147) and after (n = 102) orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in the outpatient-department of the University Hospital Department of Surgery in Hamburg-Eppendorf. CDT measurements were performed with two commercial kits in parallel (CDTect-RIA and CDT%-RIA). Short-term parameters of alcohol consumption (ethanol, methanol) indicated relapses into elevated alcohol consumption in 11.4% of the evaluated patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) before transplantation. Before OLT, median CDT values were determined to be elevated among patients with alcoholic as well as nonalcoholic end-stage liver diseases (NALD). Among patients with ALD, we found elevated CDT medians even in those who were successfully scheduled for OLT after long-term evidence of abstinence proved by biochemical short-term parameters and psychological tests. Both CDTect and CDT% assays had comparable low specificities in selected patient groups before transplantation. CDT% and CDTect were negatively correlated with the albumin level. Before the study ended, CDT was no longer implemented in the evaluation of whether an OLT should be administered. This was due to inconsistent results of CDT in ALD as well as NALD. After OLT, patients with ALD, as well as NALD, had statistically significant lower CDT medians than before OLT, which ranged within reference levels. We determined, according to CDT, elevated alcohol consumption subsequent to OLT in 4 of 13 patients with ALD who underwent transplantation during the study (median observation period: 10 months). CDT does not appear to be useful in evaluating patients before OLT. With regained specificity and high sensitivity in patients after OLT, CDT could be recommended as a standard instrument for quality control in patients with ALD after liver transplantation.

SummaryDue to a lack of available size-matched liver grafts from children, most pediatric recipients are transplanted with technical variant grafts from adult donors. Size requirements for these grafts are not well defined, and consequences of mismatched graft sizes in pediatric liver transplantation are not known. Existing formulas for calculation of a standard liver volume are mostly derived from adults disregarding the age-related percentual liver weight changes in children. In this study, we aimed to establish a formula for general use in children to calculate the standard liver volume. In a second step, the formula was applied in pediatric patients undergoing liver transplantation at our institution between 2000 and 2010 (n = 377). Analysis of a large number (n = 388) of autopsy data from children by regression analysis revealed a best fit for two formulas: "Formula 1," children 0 to ≤1 year (n = 246): standard liver volume [ml] = À143.062973 + 4.274603051 * body length [cm] + 14.78817631 * body weight [kg]; "Formula 2," children >1 to <16 years (n = 142): standard liver volume [ml] = À20.2472281 + 3.339056437 * body length [cm] + 13.11312561 * body weight [kg]. In comparison with children receiving size-matched organs, we found an elevated risk of liver graft failure in children transplanted with a small-for-size graft, whereas large-for-size organs seem to have no negative impact.

No abstract