The efferent ductules express the highest amount of estrogen receptors ESR1 (ERalpha) and ESR2 (ERbeta) within the male reproductive tract. Treatment of rats with the antiestrogen fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) causes inhibition of fluid reabsorption in the efferent ductules, leading to seminiferous tubule atrophy and infertility. To provide a more comprehensive knowledge about the molecular targets for estrogen in the rat efferent ductules, we investigated the effects of ICI 182,780 treatment on gene expression using a microarray approach. Treatment with ICI 182,780 increased or reduced at least 2-fold the expression of 263 and 98 genes, respectively. Not surprisingly, several genes that encode ion channels and macromolecule transporters were affected. Interestingly, treatment with ICI 182,780 markedly altered the expression of genes related to extracellular matrix organization. Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (Mmp7), osteopontin (Spp1), and neuronal pentraxin 1 (Nptx1) were among the most altered genes in this category. Upregulation of Mmp7 and Spp1 and downregulation of Nptx1 were validated by Northern blot. Increase in Mmp7 expression was further confirmed by immunohistochemistry and probably accounted for the decrease in collagen content observed in the efferent ductules of ICI 182,780-treated animals. Downregulation of Nptx1 probably contributed to the extracellular matrix changes and decreased amyloid deposition in the efferent ductules of ICI 182,780-treated animals. Identification of new molecular targets for estrogen action may help elucidate the regulatory role of this hormone in the male reproductive tract.

A substantial advance in our understanding on the estrogen signaling occurred in the last decade. Estrogens interact with two receptors, ESR1 and ESR2, also known as ERα and ERβ, respectively. ESR1 and ESR2 belong to the nuclear receptor family of transcription factors. In addition to the well established transcriptional effects, estrogens can mediate rapid signaling, triggered within seconds or minutes. These rapid effects can be mediated by ESRs or the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER, also known as GPR30. The effects of estrogen on cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis are often mediated by growth factors. The understanding of the cross-talk between androgen, estrogen and growth factors signaling pathways is therefore essential to understand the physiopathological mechanisms of estrogen action. In this review we focused on recent discoveries about the nature of the estrogen receptors, and on the signaling and function of estrogen in the male reproductive system. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2009;53(8):923-33 Keywords Estrogens; receptors, estrogen; reproduction; male resumo Durante a última década, ocorreu um avanço substancial no conhecimento da sinalização do estrógeno. Estrógenos interagem com dois receptores, ESR1 e ESR2, também conhecidos como ERα e ERβ, respectivamente. ESR1 e ESR2 pertencem à família de receptores nucleares, que funcionam como fatores de transcrição. Além dos bem estabelecidos efeitos transcricionais, os estrógenos medeiam a sinalização rápida, desencadeada dentro de segundos ou minutos. Esses efeitos rápidos podem ser mediados por ESRs ou pelo receptor de estrógeno acoplado à proteína G, GPER, também conhecido como GPR30. Os efeitos de estrógenos sobre a proliferação celular, diferenciação e apoptose são, muitas vezes, mediados por fatores de crescimento. Portanto, a compreensão da interação entre as vias de sinalização de andrógeno, estrógeno e fatores de crescimento é essencial para entender os mecanismos fisiopatológicos envolvidos na ação estrogênica. Nesta revisão, foram abordadas descobertas recentes sobre a estrutura dos receptores, a sinalização e a função do estrógeno no sistema reprodutor masculino. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2009;53(8):923-33

No abstract

Estrogen plays a key role in maintaining the morphology and function of the efferent ductules. We previously demonstrated that the antiestrogen fulvestrant markedly affected gene expression in the rat efferent ductules. The mechanism of fulvestrant action to modulate gene expression may involve not only the blockade of ESR1 and ESR2 estrogen receptors, but also the activation of ESR1 and ESR2 when the receptors are tethered to AP-1 or SP1 transcription factors, or the activation of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1. We therefore compared the effects of two strategies to interfere with estrogen action in the rat efferent ductules: treatment with fulvestrant or with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. Whereas fulvestrant markedly increased Mmp7 and Spp1, and reduced Nptx1 mRNA levels, no changes were observed with anastrozole. Fulvestrant caused changes in epithelial morphology that were not seen with anastrozole. Fulvestrant shifted MMP7 immunolocalization in the epithelial cells from the supranuclear to the apical region; this effect was less pronounced with anastrozole. In vitro studies of (35)S-methionine incorporation showed that protein release was increased, whereas tissue protein content in the efferent ductules of fulvestrant-treated rats was decreased. Although fulvestrant markedly affected gene expression, no changes were observed on AP-1 and SP1 DNA-binding activity. The blockade of ESRs seems to be the major reason explaining the differences between both treatments. At least some of the effects of fulvestrant appear to result from compensatory mechanisms activated by the dramatic changes caused by ESR1 blockade.

The expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes (M(1)-M(5)) was studied in the rat efferent ductules and epididymis at the mRNA and protein levels. The relative abundance of each mAChR transcript subtype differed depending on the tissue and the epididymal region analyzed. The M(1) mAChR mRNA level was more abundant in the efferent ductules than in the caput and cauda of the epididymis. The M(2) mAChR mRNA level was similar between the efferent ductules and caput of the epididymis and higher in the cauda region. The M(3) mAChR mRNA level was low in the efferent ductules and caput of the epididymis, but high levels were detected in the cauda region. mRNAs for M(4) and M(5) mAChRs were not detected in these tissues. Our studies indicated a variable degree of immunostaining for each mAChR subtype in a cell-type and tissue-specific pattern. M(1) mAChR was detected over the efferent ductule epithelium. M(2) and M(3) mAChRs were observed in the apical region of the ciliated cells. Apical and narrow cells of the initial segment showed distinct staining by M(1) antibody, whereas a supranuclear reaction was noted in the principal cells of the caput of the epididymis. In addition, staining for M(1) and M(2) mAChRs was visible in the apical membrane of some epithelial cells of the cauda region. M(3) mAChR was detected in the peritubular smooth muscle of the efferent ductules and epididymis. Functional studies suggested the involvement of this subtype in epididymal tubule contraction. Thus, the cell-specific expression of the various mAChR subtypes in the efferent ductules and epididymis suggests that these receptors play a role in the modulation of luminal fluid composition and smooth muscle contraction.