The urinary excretion profile of prednisolone and prednisone after both systemic (i.e., oral) and topical (i.e., ocular and intranasal) administration was studied by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, also to select the most appropriate marker(s) of intake for doping control purposes. Urines were collected from ten subjects every 3 h before and after the administration of therapeutic doses of pharmaceutical formulations containing either prednisone or prednisolone. Samples were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis (performed for the investigation on the glucuronide profile) followed by liquid/liquid extraction with tert‐butylmethylether in alkaline conditions. The chromatographic separation was carried out on C18 column, employing as mobile phases ultrapurified water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% of formic acid. Detection was achieved using as mass spectrometric analyzer a triple quadrupole, with positive ion electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring as acquisition mode. After both systemic and topical use, the compounds excreted in urine in higher concentration were prednisone, prednisolone and 20β‐dihydro‐prednisolone followed by 20α‐dihydro‐prednisolone and 20α/β‐dihydro‐prednisone. All were excreted mainly as unconjugated compounds, with a maximum of excretion in the first 3–9 h after the administration. After systemic use, prednisone and prednisolone were both detectable for at least 24 h in concentrations ranging from 5 to 500 ng/mL and from 5 to 900 ng/mL respectively. Whereas, after topical administration, prednisone and prednisolone were detectable for at least 18 h in concentrations ranging from 5 to 140 ng/mL and from 5 to 50 ng/mL respectively.

This article presents newly developed screening and confirmation analytical procedures to detect the misuse of nine prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors of the hypoxia-inducible factor: daprodustat, desidustat, FG2216, IOX2, IOX4, JNJ-42041935, molidustat, roxadustat and vadadustat, targeting either the parent drugs and/or their main metabolite(s). For the sample pretreatment, different extraction protocols and technologies were evaluated. The instrumental analysis was performed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to either high- or low-resolution mass spectrometry. The chromatographic separation was performed on a C18 column, employing water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% formic acid, as mobile phase. Detection was achieved using as analyzer either a triple quadrupole or an Orbitrap, with positive and negative electrospray ionization and different acquisition modes. Validation of the procedures was performed according to the ISO 17025 and World Anti-Doping Agency guidelines. The methods do not show any significant interference at the retention times of the analytes of interest. The extraction efficiency was estimated to be greater than 75% for all analytes and the matrix effect smaller than 35%. Detection capability was determined in the range of 0.25–2.0 for the screening procedure and in the range of 0.5–2.0 ng/mL for the confirmation procedure, that is, in a range of concentration small enough to reveal the abuse of the compounds considered, in case they are used as performance-enhancing agents. The repeatability of the relative retention times (CV% < 0.5) and of the relative abundances of the selected ion transitions, considered only in the case of triple quadrupole (CV% < 15), was confirmed to be fit for purpose to ensure the unambiguous identification of all the target analytes in human urine. The applicability of the newly developed methods was verified by the analysis of urine samples containing molidustat, roxadustat or daprodustat. The developed procedures enabled to detect the compounds under investigation and their main metabolites.

No abstract

An analytical procedure based on ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry was developed to screen and to confirm dutasteride and its metabolites in human urine. Sample preparation included an enzymatic hydrolysis followed by solid‐phase extraction using the strong cation exchange cartridges OASIS® MCX. The chromatographic separation was carried out on C18 column, employing as mobile phases ultra purified water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% formic acid. Detection was achieved using a triple quadrupole as a mass spectrometric analyzer, with positive ion electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring as acquisition mode. The analytical procedure developed was validated according to ISO 17025 and World Anti‐Doping Agency guidelines. The extraction efficiency was estimated to be greater than 75% for both dutasteride and its hydroxylated metabolites. Detection capability was determined in the range of 0.1–0.4 ng/mL. Specificity and repeatability of the relative retention times (CV% < 0.5) and of the relative abundances of the characteristic ion transitions selected (CV% < 10) were confirmed to be fit for purpose to ensure the unambiguous identification of dutasteride and its metabolites in human urine. The developed method was used to characterize the urinary excretion profile of dutasteride after both chronic and acute administration of therapeutic doses. After chronic administration, dutasteride and its hydroxylated metabolites were easily detected and confirmed. After acute administration, instead, only the two hydroxylated metabolites were detected for 3–4 days.

We present a quick and simple multi-targeted analytical workflow based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry for the screening in dried blood spots and dried plasma spots of a wide variety of drugs with different chemical properties. Seven different microsampling devices were evaluated in view of their application for the detection of the selected target analytes in the framework of doping control analysis. The extraction of the analytes was optimized by assessing the efficacy of protocols based on ultrasonication with aqueous buffers and/or organic solvents of different polarities. Optimal recoveries were obtained by using pure methanol or mixtures of methanol/acetonitrile and methanol/isopropanol, depending on both the device and the target analytes. The method was fully validated according to both ISO17025 and the requirements of the World Anti-Doping Agency: all the analytes were clearly distinguishable from the matrix, with limits of detection in the range of 0.1–3.0 ng mL –1 . Stability studies simulating the storage of samples before the analysis and in view of a possible re-analysis showed that most of the analytes were stable for at least 24 h at 50 °C and for at least 3 weeks at 25 and at 4 °C. The real applicability of the method was assessed by analyzing the samples collected after the administration of two model drugs, acetazolamide and deflazacort. The performance of the method was confirmed to be fit for purpose, and data obtained in blood can also be used to complement those available in urine, allowing to refine the knowledge concerning the pharmacokinetic profiles.