Cunha ACV, Burke TN, França FJR, Marques AP. Effect of global posture reeducation and of static stretching onto pain, range of motion, and quality of life in women with chronic neck pain: a random clinical trial. Clinics. 2008;63:763-70. PURPOSE:Compare the effect of conventional static stretching and muscle chain stretching, as proposed by the global posture reeducation method, in the manual therapy of patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: Thirty-three female patients aged 35 to 60 years old, 31 of whom completed the program, were randomly divided into two groups: The global posture reeducation group (n=15) performed muscle chain stretching, while the conventional stretching group (n=16) performed conventional static muscle stretching. Both groups also underwent manual therapy. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment and at a six-week follow-up appointment and tested for pain intensity (by means of visual analog scale), range of motion (by goniometry), and health-related quality of life (by the SF-36 questionnaire). The treatment program consisted of two 1-hour individual sessions per week for six weeks. Data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: Significant pain relief and range of motion improvement were observed after treatment in both groups, with a slight reduction at follow-up time. Quality of life also improved after treatment, except for the global posture reeducation group in one domain; at follow-up, there was improvement in all domains, except that both groups reported increased pain. There were no significant differences between groups CONCLUSION: Conventional stretching and muscle chain stretching in association with manual therapy were equally effective in reducing pain and improving the range of motion and quality of life of female patients with chronic neck pain, both immediately after treatment and at a six-week follow-up, suggesting that stretching exercises should be prescribed to chronic neck pain patients.

No abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about postural control among elderly individuals with osteoporosis and its relationship with falls. It has been suggested that elderly women with kyphosis and osteoporosis are at greater risk of falling. The aim of this study was to evaluate posture and postural control among elderly women with and without osteoporosis. DESIGN AND SETTING:Cross-sectional study conducted at the Physical Therapy and Electromyography Laboratory, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). METHODS:Sixty-six elderly women were selected from the bone metabolism disorders clinic, Division of Rheumatology, USP, and were divided into two groups: osteoporosis and controls, according to their bone mineral density (BMD). Postural control was assessed using the Limits of Stability (LOS) test and the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIBm) and posture, using photometry. RESULTS:The elderly women with osteoporosis swayed at higher velocity on a stable surface with opened eyes (0.30 versus 0.20 degrees/second; P = 0.038). In both groups, the center of pressure (COP) was at 30% in the LOS, but with different placements: 156° in the osteoporosis group and 178° in the controls (P = 0.045). Osteoporosis patients fell more than controls did (1.0 versus 0.0; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS:The postural control in elderly women with osteoporosis differed from that of the controls, with higher sway velocity and maximum displacement of COP. Despite postural abnormalities such as hyperkyphosis and forward head, the COP position was posteriorized.RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Pouco se sabe sobre o controle postural de idosos com osteoporose e sua relação com as quedas. Foi sugerido que idosas cifóticas com osteoporose têm maior risco de quedas. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo avaliar o controle postural e a postura em idosas com e sem osteoporose. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo transversal realizado no Laboratório de Avaliação Fisioterapêutica e Eletromiografia da Faculdade de Medicina daUniversidade de São Paulo (USP). MÉTODOS: Sessenta e seis mulheres idosas foram selecionadas da Clínica de Doenças Osteometabólicas da Divisão de Reumatologia daUniversidade de São Paulo e divididas em dois grupos: osteoporose e controle, de acordo com a densidade mineral óssea (DMO). Foi avaliado o controle postural pelos testes Limite de Estabilidade (LOS) e Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIBm) e a postura pela fotometria. RESULTADOS:As idosas com osteoporose oscilaram com maior velocidade em superfície firme com olhos abertos (0,30 x 0,20 graus/segundo, P = 0,038). O COP (centro de pressão) de ambos os grupos encontrava-se a 30% do LOS, porém com posicionamentos distintos: 156° no grupo osteoporose e 178° no grupo controle (P = 0,045). As osteoporóticas caíram com maior frequência em comparação aos controles (1,0 x 0,0, P = 0,036).CONCLUSÃO: O controle postural de idosas com osteoporose diferiu dos controles, com maior velocidade de oscilação e máximo deslocamento do...

These findings suggest that women with patellofemoral pain present greater dynamic knee valgus and hip muscle weakness. Abductor and posterolateral hip muscles strength are associated with increased FPPA only in the pain-free population.

ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between the q-angle and anterior knee pain severity, functional capacity, dynamic knee valgus and hip abductor torque in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).MethodsThis study included 22 women with PFPS. The q-angle was assessed using goniometry: the participants were positioned in dorsal decubitus with the knee and hip extended, and the hip and foot in neutral rotation. Anterior knee pain severity was assessed using a visual analog scale, and functional capacity was assessed using the anterior knee pain scale. Dynamic valgus was evaluated using the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) of the knee, which was recorded using a digital camera during step down, and hip abductor peak torque was recorded using a handheld dynamometer.ResultsThe q-angle did not present any significant correlation with severity of knee pain (r = −0.29; p = 0.19), functional capacity (r = −0.08; p = 0.72), FPPA (r = −0.28; p = 0.19) or isometric peak torque of the abductor muscles (r = −0.21; p = 0.35).ConclusionThe q-angle did not present any relationship with pain intensity, functional capacity, FPPA, or hip abductor peak torque in the patients with PFPS.