Objective: To evaluate health professionals working at a tertiary pediatric hospital in terms of their knowledge regarding the practical use of metered-dose inhalers. Methods: Practical and written tests on the use of metered-dose inhalers were applied to physicians, physical therapists, nurses and nursing assistants. A score from 0 to 10 was assigned to each evaluation, and median scores were calculated for each professional category. Questions with higher and lower correct values were identified, and a descriptive comparison was made regarding the performance of the various professional categories. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis method for comparison of medians. A sequential logistic multiple regression analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 30 resident physicians or interns in the pediatrics department, 23 attending physicians, 29 physical therapists, 33 nurses and 31 nursing assistants were evaluated. Resident physicians, physical therapists and attending physicians performed significantly better than did nurses and nursing assistants. Only resident physicians had a median score greater than 6. Conclusions: The health professionals evaluated, particularly the nurses and nursing assistants, who are directly involved in the practical use of metered-dose inhalers, possess insufficient knowledge regarding the use of such inhalers.
Higher albuterol dosage regimens did not result in lower admission rate or shorter length of stay in the ER, but showed similar safety profile for children with moderate to severe acute asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1122-1130. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Objectives: To review the most relevant articles regarding the technical aspects of inhalation therapy, inhalers currently available, and especially major advances in inhalation therapy in pediatrics. Sources:Articles of MEDLINE database from 1983 were reviewed, in addition to book chapters, and the most important studies were selected according to the criteria established for this article. Summary of the findings:Conventional nebulizers have a number of inconveniences, and breath-enhanced and breath-actuated inhalers are more attractive options. Among dry powder inhalers, we highlight those using passive and active powder dispersion mechanisms, which provide higher rates of drug deposition in the lung. Among pressurized metered-dose inhalers, we highlight breath-actuated, breath-coordinated, and velocity-modifying inhalers. These inhalers should be used preferably together with spacers, since the use of spacers produces a twofold increase in pulmonary drug deposition. Conclusions:For children younger than 8 years, pressurized metereddose inhalers with spacers are the most appropriate devices, since they provide a practical approach associated with greater lung deposition. In children older than 8 years who can generate high inspiratory flow rates, dry powder devices are best suited. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(5):367-376:Nebulizers, pressurized metered-dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, spacers, pulmonary drug deposition. ResumoObjetivos: Revisar os artigos mais relevantes a respeito dos aspectos técnicos da terapêutica inalatória, dos inaladores disponíveis e principalmente dos principais avanços obtidos na inaloterapia em pediatria. Fontes dos dados:Foram revisados os artigos contidos na base de dados MEDLINE a partir de 1983, além de capítulos de livros, e selecionados os de maior importância de acordo com os critérios estabelecidos para este artigo. Síntese dos dados:Os nebulizadores convencionais apresentam uma série de inconveniências, sendo que inaladores com desempenho melhorado pela respiração e os ativados pela respiração são opções mais atrativas. Dentre os inaladores de pó seco, destacam-se os que utilizam mecanismos passivos e ativos de dispersão de pó, que propiciam maiores taxas de deposição pulmonar das drogas. Entre os inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados destacam-se os ativados pela respiração, os coordenados pela respiração e os modificadores de velocidade. Devem ser usados preferencialmente em conjunto com espaçadores, pois a utilização deste aumenta em até duas vezes a deposição pulmonar das drogas.Conclusões: Para menores de 8 anos, os inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados com espaçadores são os mais adequados, dada a sua praticidade associada à elevada deposição pulmonar que proporcionam. Nos maiores de 8 anos capazes de gerar altos fluxos inspiratórios, os dispositivos de pó são os mais indicados.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(5):367-376: Nebulizadores, inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados, inaladores de pó seco, espaçadores, deposição pulmonar de drogas. Advances in inhalation the...
Objectives: To review the most relevant articles regarding the technical aspects of inhalation therapy, inhalers currently available, and especially major advances in inhalation therapy in pediatrics.Sources: Articles of MEDLINE database from 1983 were reviewed, in addition to book chapters, and the most important studies were selected according to the criteria established for this article. Summary of the findings:Conventional nebulizers have a number of inconveniences, and breath-enhanced and breath-actuated inhalers are more attractive options. Among dry powder inhalers, we highlight those using passive and active powder dispersion mechanisms, which provide higher rates of drug deposition in the lung. Among pressurized metered-dose inhalers, we highlight breath-actuated, breath-coordinated, and velocity-modifying inhalers. These inhalers should be used preferably together with spacers, since the use of spacers produces a twofold increase in pulmonary drug deposition. Conclusions:For children younger than 8 years, pressurized metered-dose inhalers with spacers are the most appropriate devices, since they provide a practical approach associated with greater lung deposition. In children older than 8 years who can generate high inspiratory flow rates, dry powder devices are best suited. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(5):367-376:Nebulizers, pressurized metered-dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, spacers, pulmonary drug deposition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.