The presence of a food-entrainable oscillator (FEO) independent from the SCN is now well established, but until now its location and characterization have been elusive. Because its expression requires priming of the animal’s metabolism toward a catabolic state, it is possible that metabolic rhythms may be related to FEO. The present study was designed to determine whether metabolic rhythms persist during fasting and whether such rhythms could be entrained to a restricted feeding schedule. The results indicate persistent rhythms of triacylglycerides, free fatty acids, glucose, and proteins during fasting, whereas ketone bodies and liver glycogen changed their concentration as a function of fasting. Daily food pulses of 2 h entrained the rhythms of triacylglycerides and free fatty acids and restored ketone bodies and liver glycogen to similar levels as controls. Neither glucose nor proteins were affected by the food pulse. These results indicate the relevance of lipid metabolism as a phenomenon associated with the FEO.

This study was conducted to assess effects of the nutritional plane before and during breeding on feed intake, body weight (BW) change, reproductive performance, body condition score (BCS), body mass indexes (BMI), and body composition of three breeds of hair sheep. Twenty-five Dorper, 27 Katahdin, and 33 St. Croix ewes were allocated to groups and treatments based on initial BW and age. Supplementation treatments were soybean meal fed at 0.16% BW (LS) and a mixture of 25% soybean meal and 75% ground corn given at 0.8% BW (HS; dry matter basis) for 88 to 102 days including 17 days after breeding. Wheat straw intake (% BW) was greater (p < 0.01) for LS than for HS. Average daily gain and BCS change were similar among breeds, but both were greater for HS vs. LS. Birth rate, litter size, total litter birth weight, gestation length, and number of services were similar among breeds (p > 0.05), although individual lamb birth weight was lower for St. Croix than for Katahdin (p < 0.05). None of these reproductive variables were influenced by treatment or the breed × treatment interaction (p > 0.05). There were no breed differences in whole body concentrations of water, fat, protein, ash, or energy in week 0 or 4, but in 8 week concentrations of water, protein, and ash were greatest among breeds for St. Croix (p < 0.05) and levels of fat and energy were lower for St. Croix than for Dorper (p < 0.05). In week 8, total amounts and concentrations of fat and energy were greater for HS vs. LS and those of water, protein, and ash were less for HS (p < 0.05). There were interactions (p < 0.05) between treatment and period in blood concentrations of cholesterol and non-esterified fatty acids and between breed, treatment, and period in level of triglycerides and total antioxidant capacity. The concentration of cortisol was greater for HS vs. LS (p < 0.05). In conclusion, supplementation did not influence reproductive performance despite differences in BW and BCS change, which may be due to the initial moderate BCS and greater wheat straw intake for the LS treatment.

Female hair sheep, 27 Dorper (DOR), 41 Katahdin (KAT), and 39 St. Croix (STC), were used to determine influences of the nutritional plane before breeding and in early gestation on feed intake, body weight, body condition score, body mass indexes, blood constituent concentrations, and reproductive performance. There were 35 multiparous and 72 primiparous sheep, with initial ages of 5.6 ± 0.25 years and 1.5 ± 0.01 years, respectively (average overall initial age of 2.8 ± 0.20 years). Wheat straw (4% crude protein; dry matter [DM] basis) was consumed ad libitum and supplemented with approximately 0.15% initial body weight (BW) of soybean meal (LS) or a 1:3 mixture of soybean meal and rolled corn at 1% BW (HS; DM). The supplementation period was 162 days, with the breeding of animals in two sets sequentially, with the pre-breeding period 84 and 97 days, and that after breeding began at 78 and 65 days, respectively. Wheat straw DM intake (1.75, 1.30, 1.57, 1.15, 1.80, and 1.38% BW; SEM = 0.112) was lower (p < 0.05), but average daily gain (−46, 42, −44, 70, −47, and 51 g for DOR-LS, DOR-HS, KAT-LS, KAT-HS, STC-LS, and STC-HS, respectively; SEM = 7.3) was greater (p < 0.05) for HS than LS treatment during the supplementation period. Additionally, changes in body condition score during the supplementation period (−0.61, 0.36, −0.53, 0.27, −0.39, and −0.18; SEM = 0.058), and changes in body mass index based on height at the withers and body length from the point of the shoulder to the pin bone (BW/[height × length], g/cm2) from 7 days before supplementation (day −7) to day 162 were −1.99, 0.07, −2.19, −0.55, −2.39, and 0.17 for DOR-LS, DOR-HS, KAT-LS, KAT-HS, STC-LS, and STC-HS, respectively; SEM = 0.297) were affected by supplement treatment. All blood constituent concentrations and characteristics addressed varied with the day of sampling (−7, 14, 49, 73, and 162) as well as the interaction between the supplement treatment and the day (p < 0.05), with few effects of interactions involving breed. Birth rate (66.7, 93.5, 84.6, 95.5, 82.8, and 100.0; SEM = 9.83) and individual lamb birth weight (4.50, 4.61, 4.28, 3.98, 3.73, and 3.88 kg; SEM = 0.201) were not affected by supplement treatment (p = 0.063 and 0.787, respectively), although litter size (0.92, 1.21, 1.17, 1.86, 1.12, and 1.82; SEM = 0.221) and total litter birth weight (5.84, 5.74, 5.92, 7.52, 5.04, and 6.78 kg for DOR-LS, DOR-HS, KAT-LS, KAT-HS, STC-LS, and STC-HS, respectively; SEM = 0.529) were greater (p < 0.05) for HS than for LS. In conclusion, although there was some compensation in wheat straw intake for the different levels of supplementation, soybean meal given alone rather than with cereal grain adversely affected BW, BCS, BMI, and reproductive performance, the latter primarily through litter size but also via a trend for an effect on the birth rate. Hence, the supplementation of low-protein and high-fiber forage such as wheat straw should include a consideration of the inclusion of a feedstuff(s) high in energy in addition to nitrogen.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or equine and human chorionic gonadotrophins (eCG and hCG) were evaluated for oestrus/ovulation synchronization (E/OS), as well as the influence of GnRH 5 days post-breeding (dpb) on embryo viability (EV), and progesterone (P4) levels on Day 16 and 30 after laparoscopic AI (LAI) or natural service (NS). Fifty-four lactating/non-lactating Alpine breed goats (average of 3.82±1.2s.d. years of age) of mixed parity were E/OS during the early transitional breeding phase using 12±1 day of 300mg of P4 and 2mL of prostaglandin F2α analogue given at P4 removal. The experiment included a sub-group from a larger study in which a completely randomised design was used. The germane data were arranged as a 2×2×2 factorial. This study focused on goats receiving 120IU of eCG and 60IU of hCG (n=40), or GnRH analogue (n=14) 24h after P4 removal. At 5 dpb, 25 goats received 1mL (IM) of GnRH and the control (n=29) received 1mL of physiologic saline. Goats were time-bred 48h after P4 withdrawal by LAI (n=33) or NS (n=21). Pregnancy was diagnosed at 18 to 24, 30, and 40 dpb by non-return to oestrus, pregnancy-specific protein B, and ultrasound, respectively. EV was evaluated as the difference between pregnancy diagnosis results. Blood serum P4 was evaluated at 5, 16, and 30 dpb. A logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis. Pregnancy rate (PR) for LAI or NS, at 18–24, 30, and 40 days was 73 vs. 76%, 67 vs. 62%, and 64 vs. 67%, respectively (P&gt;0.72). In contrast, when GnRH was used for E/OS, the 5 dpb GnRH influenced EV at 30 days (95 vs. 81%; P=0.06) but not at 40 days (89 vs. 86%; P&gt;0.35), compared with placebo. Similarly, with the exception of PR at 40 days (43 vs. 72%; P=0.05), for the GnRH and eCG/hCG E/OS groups, respectively, PR was not affected (P&gt;0.12) by either E/OS or GnRH 5 dpb or their interaction (P&gt;0.35) at any pregnancy diagnosis (i.e. 18–24, 30, or 40 dpb). Likewise, levels of P4 at 5, 16, and 30 dpb did not affect PR at 18–24, 30, and 40 dpb (P&gt;0.92, 0.71, and 0.11). As shown in Table 1, the level of P4 was not influenced for goats receiving GnRH or placebo at 5, 16, or 30 dpb. The baseline mean P4 blood serum level for goats receiving GnRH 5 dpb differed at 16 but not at 30 dpb (P&lt;0.001). Table 1 Blood serum progesterone (P4, ng mL−1) in response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or placebo given 5 days post-breeding Sampling day GnRH Placebo P &gt;1 Mean ±SE Mean ±SE 5 (baseline) 6.2a 0.83 5.7a 0.72 0.66 16 11.7b 1.11 11.0b 1.05 0.65 30 6.2a 0.89 7.6c 0.84 0.26 a–cMean values with different superscripts within a column signify statistical difference for GnRH (P&lt;0.001) and placebo (P&lt;0.02). 1Probability for mean differences in the same row.

Female hair sheep, 27 Dorper (DOR), 41 Katahdin (KAT), and 39 St. Croix (STC), were used to determine influences of nutritional planes before and after breeding on performance. There were 35 multiparous and 72 primiparous sheep, the latter 2.8±0.20 yr of age. Wheat straw [4% crude protein; dry matter (DM) basis] was consumed ad libitum and supplemented with approximately 0.25% initial body weight (BW) of soybean meal (SBM; Low) or a 1:3 mixture of SBM and rolled corn at 1% BW (High; DM). The supplementation period was 162 d, and with breeding of animals in 2 groups sequentially the pre-breeding period was 84 and 97 d and that after breeding began was 78 and 65 d. Wheat straw DM intake (1.75, 1.30, 1.57, 1.15, 1.80, and 1.38% BW; SEM=0.112), average daily gain (-46, 42, -44, 70, -47, and 51 g; SEM=7.3), and change in body condition score (-0.61, 0.36, -0.53, 0.27, -0.39, and -0.18 for DOR-Low, DOR-High, KAT-Low, KAT-High, STC-Low, and STC-High, respectively; SEM=0.058) were influenced (P &lt; 0.05) by supplement treatment. Birth rate (66.7, 93.5, 84.6, 95.5, 82.8, and 100.0; SEM=9.83) and individual lamb birth weight (4.50, 4.61, 4.28, 3.98, 3.73, and 3.88 kg; SEM=0.201) were not affected by supplement treatment (P = 0.063 and 0.787, respectively), although litter size (0.92, 1.21, 1.17, 1.86, 1.12, and 1.82; SEM=0.221) and total litter birth weight (5.84, 5.74, 5.92, 7.52, 5.04, and 6.78 kg for DOR-Low, DOR-High, KAT-Low, KAT-High, STC-Low, and STC-High, respectively; SEM=0.529) were greater (P &lt; 0.05) for High than for Low. In conclusion, although there was some compensation in wheat straw intake for the different levels of supplementation, SBM given alone rather than with cereal grain adversely affected body weight and condition and reproductive performance, the latter primarily through litter size but also via a trend for an effect on birth rate.