The class II transactivator (CIITA) is the master regulator of MHC class II molecules (MHC II). In melanoma, the MHC II are constitutively expressed due to an abnormal transcription of CIITA from its promoter III (pIII), and requires the presence of a 1-kb enhancer located upstream from this latter. Since mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) have been shown to be activated in most melanomas, we sought to analyze their possible involvement in CIITA expression. Using chemical inhibitors and dominantnegative constructs of MAPK-ERK kinase (Mek1) and MAPK-JNK, we evidenced the inhibition of MHC II and CIITA expression in melanoma cell lines displaying activated MAPK. Transcriptional regulation by MAPK is known to involve the AP-1 transcription factor family. Sequence analysis revealed an AP-1-responsive motif in the enhancer of CIITA pIII at -5954/-5947 from the site of transcription initiation. Its mutagenesis reduced CIITA expression four-to fivefold in melanoma cell lines and alleviated the effect of dominant-negative constructs of the MAPK pathway. Together, our findings demonstrate that MAPK-ERK and MAPK-JNK are regulators of CIITA transcription in melanoma, and pinpoint an AP-1-responsive site in the CIITA gene pIII. This should have considerable impact on our understanding of the physio-pathologic expression of MHC II.

In contrast with melanocytes, melanomas display constitutive expression of HLA-DR (HLA-DR+). This abnormal expression has been associated with tumour progression and metastatic dissemination. We have previously reported that this deregulation of HLA-D genes is due to the abnormal constitutive expression of the lymphocyte-specific isoform of class II transactivator (B-CIITA), in addition to its fibroblast form (F-CIITA), which is usually expressed in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-negative interferon-gamma-induced cell types, such as melanocytes. In this study, we investigated the abnormal expression of B-CIITA in a panel of melanoma cell lines displaying differential HLA-DR expression profiles, and analysed whether such a molecular event can participate in tumour progression. Our results showed that the abnormal expression of B-CIITA did not have any particular effect, in comparison with F-CIITA, on the classical activity of CIITA HLA-D gene regulation. As CIITA has also been shown to regulate genes other than HLA-D, we evaluated the modulation of those encoding cyclin D1, YARS (tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase) and TRIP1 (transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta receptor-interacting protein), proteins involved in cell cycle/apoptosis balance, angiogenesis and resistance to TGF-beta, respectively. In contrast with other cell types, neither B-CIITA nor F-CIITA was able to modulate these genes in melanoma cell lines. Thus, the activity of CIITA, whether lymphocyte-specific or fibroblast-specific, is restricted to HLA-D gene expression in these tumours. Accordingly, our data suggest that CIITA is not involved per se in tumour progression; rather, it is the MHC class II molecules themselves, through tumour antigen presentation and the induction of tumour antigen-specific CD4 lymphocyte anergy, that may participate in immune escape and melanoma progression.