The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Objectives Many studies have looked at the effects of physical exercise on long-term memory. However, to date, no study has compared the effect of different intensities and protocols of physical exercise and different rest conditions on long-term memory. Methods In three studies (N=59) we measured the extent that physical exercise (in its varying intensities) and wakeful rest (active-rest; in which participants were cognitively engaged while seated and passive-rest; no cognitive engagement while seated) could influence long-term memory. Across all three studies, nearly identical procedures were employed, using the same old/new recognition memory test in order to establish the most effective protocol for cognitive enhancement. In Study 1, the effects of continuous moderate intensity exercise, uninterrupted wakeful rest (passive) and rest with an engagement task (active) were explored. In Study 2, continuous moderate intensity exercise was compared to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and passive rest. Study 3 observed the effects of low-, moderate- and high-intensity continuous exercise. Results Across the three studies moderate intensity exercise had the greatest positive impact on memory performance. Passive rest was more effective than active rest, however, less than high-intensity interval-training (HIIT). Conclusion Our findings suggest that it is not necessary to physically overexert oneself in order to achieve observable improvements to long-term memory. By also investigating uninterrupted wakeful rest, it reaffirmed the importance of the consolidation period for the formation of long-term memories.

No abstract