Background and Aims:Complementary alternative medicine (CAM) covers many types of treatments and procedures that are usually not included in conventional medicine and are used in addition to physician-prescribed drugs to “complement” treatment. Although liver disease is prevalent in Saudi Arabia, not much is known about CAM use among Saudi liver disease patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAM use in these patients and their attitudes toward it.Materials and Methods:Patients were recruited randomly from a tertiary care hepatology clinic at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from February 4 to March 20, 2012. A four-page questionnaire was used to interview patients.Results:Of all the 232 participants surveyed, 55.6% have used or are using CAM to treat their liver disease with 45.0% of CAM users stating that they believe it has a positive effect on their treatment. Honey was the most used CAM treatment among the participants (39.0%). Herb use was represented by 31.8% of all users, while 13.5% used bloodletting as a treatment. Cautery was the least used CAM method (3.4%). Nearly 76.6% of CAM users were satisfied with using alternative treatments to help control their disease. Nearly 69.4% of users and nonusers stated that they believe CAM treatments to have numerous beneficial effects. Nearly 60.5% of CAM users stated that their physician had no knowledge of their CAM use. Of the factors included in linear multivariate regression analysis (including: Age, gender, and family CAM use, among other socioeconomic factors) only family CAM use was considered a significant independent factor affecting participants CAM use (Beta = 0.582, 95% CI: 0.372-0.754, P = 0.0001).Conclusion:More than half of the patients have reported CAM use. Overall, more than two-thirds of the entire sample believed that CAM treatments have numerous health benefits.

No abstract

BACKGROUNDCurrently, there are no data on the prevalence of breast arterial calcification (BAC) in Saudi women. Furthermore, there are no data on the relationship between BAC and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) as a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor in Saudi women who undergo mammography.OBJECTIVEExamine the role of BAC as a potential female-specific risk factor for CAD in Saudi women in order to investigate the relationship between BAC and CACS in women who undergo a screening mammography, and study the relationship between BAC and CAD risk factors, including age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), dyslipidemia, and family history of CAD.DESIGNRetrospective, medical records review.SETTINGSingle tertiary care center.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study cohort included women who had mammograms and a CACS scan, and for whom data on CAD risk stratification and CAD risk factors had been collected within one year of each other from 2014 to 2017. Women with CAD were excluded from the study.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESBreast arterial calcification as a marker for coronary artery disease.SAMPLE SIZE307 Saudi women.RESULTSBAC was found in 142 (46%) patients in the study population. BAC+ women were significantly older than the BAC− women (P=.001), and a strong association was found between BAC and CACS (P=.0001), diabetes (P=.0001), hypertension (P=.021), and CKD (P=.0031). However, no association was found between BAC and tobacco smoking, dyslipidemia, and family history of CAD. In addition, a strong correlation was found between CACS and the components of the BAC score (P<.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that age, CAC, and CKD are the only strong predictors of BAC.CONCLUSIONSThe proportion of BAC in Saudi women is 46%, and there may be a strong association between BAC and CAC, age, hypertension, and CKD. A large-scale prospective research study is necessary to validate the role of BAC on screening mammography as a CAD risk stratification tool and before routine reporting of BAC on a mammography report.LIMITATIONSBecause this was a retrospective study, patient selection bias cannot be excluded.

No abstract