Aims “Get It Right First Time” (GIRFT) and NHS England’s Best Practice Tariff (BPT) have published directives advising that patients over the ages of 65 (GIRFT) and 69 years (BPT) receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) should receive cemented implants and have brought in financial penalties if this policy is not observed. Despite this, worldwide, uncemented component use has increased, a situation described as a ‘paradox’. GIRFT and BPT do, however, acknowledge more data are required to support this edict with current policies based on the National Joint Registry survivorship and implant costs. Methods This study compares THA outcomes for over 1,000 uncemented Corail/Pinnacle constructs used in all age groups/patient frailty, under one surgeon, with identical pre- and postoperative pathways over a nine-year period with mean follow-up of five years and two months (range: nine months to nine years and nine months). Implant information, survivorship, and regular postoperative Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected and two comparisons undertaken: a comparison of those aged over 65 years with those 65 and under and a second comparison of those aged 70 years and over with those aged under 70. Results Overall revision rate was 1.3% (13/1,004). A greater number of revisions were undertaken in those aged over 65 years, but numbers were small and did not reach significance. The majority of revisions were implant-independent. Single component analysis revealed a 99.9% and 99.6% survival for the uncemented cup and femoral component, respectively. Mean patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improvement for all ages outperformed the national PROMs and a significantly greater proportion of those aged over 65/69 years reached and maintained a meaningful improvement in their OHS earlier than their younger counterparts (p < 0.05/0.01 respectively). Conclusion This study confirms that this uncemented THA system can be used safely and effectively in patient groups aged over 65 years and those over 69 years, with low complication and revision rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):293–300.

An 18-year-old male with a history of diabetes presented with hemiparesis. His serum glucose was low, but did not fit the numerical criteria for hypoglycemia. His symptoms rapidly reversed after glucose infusion. This case illustrates crucial features of hypoglycemia. Symptoms may be atypical in the young adult population and may occur at levels higher than numerical definitions. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding the variability in symptoms of hypoglycemia and serum levels necessary to produce them. Lack of vigilance can lead to delayed critical intervention. Understanding this aspect of hypoglycemia also has implications for training prehospital personnel.

Pain if found to be the prime most factor for most of the patients to visit the dental clinic. Pain can be associated to different reasons, might be due to periodontal reason, due to local infection, due to any oral surgical trauma, due to any peri apical infection, due to impingement of the prostheses to the soft tissue. But most often patient visit to the dental clinic with the pain associated with endodontic reason. So one should have an adequate knowledge to differentiate between the main cause of the endodontic pain and to diagnose the same with a proper treatment plan.