Reactive arthritis (ReA) following bacterial infection from the urogenital and gastrointestinal tract is widely described but is not typical post-viral infections. This report presents the second case of ReA after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United States. A 45-year-old black male with chronic low back pain was hospitalized for 45 days with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), complicated due to the development of multiorgan failure managed with intubation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and hemodialysis. He was subsequently discharged to an acute rehabilitation facility where he complained of new-onset pain in his shoulders, left elbow, and left knee three weeks after a negative SARS-CoV-2 test. He was readmitted from his acute rehabilitation facility due to recurrent fever and the development of a swollen, warm left knee. Laboratory studies at readmission showed elevated inflammatory markers, negative extensive infectious disease workup, and aseptic inflammatory left knee synovial fluid without crystals. Testing returned negative for most common antibodies seen in immunemediated arthritides (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus), as well as for common respiratory and gastrointestinal tract pathogens responsible for viral arthritis. The multidisciplinary inpatient medical team deemed the clinical presentation and laboratory findings most consistent with ReA. The patient received a course of oral corticosteroids, followed by a second course due to the recurrence of symptoms weeks after initial treatment and recovery. The current body of medical literature on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology supports plausible mechanisms on how this infection may induce ReA. Such a scenario should be considered in the differential of COVID-19-recovered patients presenting with polyarthritis as prompt steroid treatment may help patient recovery.
Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to any part of the body can leave a trail of insidious complications. When the spinal cord is the injured organ, these sequelae can be debilitating to the patient and often exhaust all known therapeutic approaches available to the providers. The management of pain associated with GSWs to the spine is often a clinical challenge and there is often a question as to whether or not surgical intervention can help with pain relief in these cases. Here, we present a 45-year-old woman who experienced delayed radicular pain following a GSW to the spine with a retained bullet at the level of the lumbosacral canal. After an unsuccessful comprehensive multimodal analgesia, the patient underwent surgical removal of the bullet, which did not successfully provide a substantial lasting analgesic effect. This case demonstrates the potential for surgical failure and supports the general recommendation of more conservative management in this population.
We report a 58-year-old female with severe throat pain, difficulty swallowing, choking on solid meals, coughing, and hoarseness. CT angiography of the chest revealed vascular compression of the esophagus by an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA). The patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and revascularization to address the ARSA. The patient experienced significant improvement in her symptoms following the surgical intervention.Dysphagia lusoria is a rare condition involving compression of the esophagus and airway by an ARSA. While medical management is the first line of treatment for mild symptoms, surgical intervention is often necessary for severe cases or those unresponsive to conservative management. TEVAR with revascularization is a feasible and minimally invasive option for treating symptomatic non-aneurysmal ARSA, potentially resulting in favorable outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.