Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) is one of the major sources of mortality and morbidity associated with hepatic surgery. Ac2-26, a short peptide of Annexin A1 protein, has been proved to have a protective effect against IRI. However, whether it exerts a protective effect on HIRI has not been reported. The HIRI mice model and the oxidative damage model of H2O2-induced AML12 cells were established to investigate whether Ac2-26 could alleviate HIRI by regulating the activation of IL-22/IL-22R1/STAT3 signaling. The protective effect of Ac2-26 was measured by various biochemical parameters related to liver function, apoptosis, inflammatory reaction, mitochondrial function and the expressions of IL-22, IL-22R1, p-STAT3Tyr705. We discovered that Ac2-26 reduced the Suzuki score and cell death rate, and increased the cell viability after HIRI. Moreover, we unraveled that Ac2-26 significantly decreased the number of apoptotic hepatocytes, and the expressions of cleaved-caspase-3 and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. Furthermore, HIRI increased the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA), NADP+/NADPH ratio and reactive oxygen species (ROS), whereas Ac2-26 decreased them significantly. Additionally, Ac2-26 remarkably alleviated mitochondria dysfunction, which was represented by an increase in the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content and mitochondrial membrane potential, a decrease in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage. Finally, we revealed that Ac2-26 pretreatment could significantly inhibit the activation of IL-22/IL22R1/STAT3 signaling. In conclusion, this work demonstrated that Ac2-26 ameliorated HIRI by reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, which might be closely related to the inhibition of the IL-22/IL22R1/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Inflammation is one of the most crucial mechanism underlying hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI). Several studies have shown that Ac2-26, the active N-terminal peptide of Annexin A1, could modulate anti-inflammatory processes and protect the organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). However the effects of Ac2-26 on an HIRI model have not been reported to date. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether Ac2-26 pretreatment could protect hepatocytes against acute HIRI by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration through regulation of the high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1)/Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB signaling pathway. To this end, a total of 72 adult C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into sham operation (sham), ischemia-reperfusion (I/R), I/R + Ac2-26 and Ac2-26 groups. The HIRI model was established by occluding the branch of the hepatic pedicle to the left and median liver lobes with an atraumatic vascular clamp for 45 min, followed by reperfusion for 24 h. The expression of HMGB1, TLR4, NF-κB, IκBα and lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D (Ly6G) was detected using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemical staining; serum levels of HMGB1 were evaluated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Flow cytometry was used to detect the proportion of neutrophil. The results indicated that Ac2-26 preconditioning rescued hepatocyte dysfunctions induced by HIRI. In addition, HIRI was associated with a significant increase in HMGB1 expression and release, accompanied by increased expression of TLR4, which was significantly inhibited by Ac2-26. Furthermore, the expression of phosphorylated (p)-NF-κB and the ratio of p-NF-κB to NF-κB were markedly increased, while the expression of IκBα was decreased in the I/R group compared with those in the sham group; however, these effects were reversed by Ac2-26 administration. Additionally, Ac2-26 administration significantly inhibited neutrophil infiltration and resulted in low levels of neutrophils and Ly6G as well as reduced myeloperoxidase activity. Taken together, these results indicated that Ac2-26 pretreatment serves a protective role against HIRI by regulating the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and inhibiting neutrophil infiltration.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining omalizumab with budesonide formoterol to treat children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, and investigate the effect of this combination therapy on pulmonary and immune functions. Methods: The data of 88 children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, who were admitted to our hospital between July 2021 and July 2022, were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned either to control group (n = 44; received budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) or experimental group (n = 44; received omalizumab subcutaneous injection + budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) using computer-generated randomization. The clinical efficacy, asthma control (measured using childhood Asthma-Control Test [C-ACT] score), pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow), immune function (cluster of differentiation 3 cells [CD3+ cells], cluster of differentiation 4 cells [CD4+ cells], immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin E), and adverse reactions were observed and compared between both groups. Results: After treatment, the experimental group had improved levels of pulmonary function and immune function indexes, higher C-ACT scores, and a higher overall response rate than the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between both groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of omalizumab with budesonide formoterol for treating moderate and severe allergic asthma in children demonstrated promising clinical efficacy and improved their pulmonary and immune functions, leading to more rational asthma control. The combined regimen demonstrated satisfactory clinical safety and deserved clinical promotion.

Background and aim: Bronchial asthma is a prevalent type of respiratory disease that affects a large proportion of pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the clinical effects of budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in treating bronchial asthma. Methods: Eighty-six children with bronchial asthma were equally divided into study and control groups via randomized double-blind controlled trial. The control group was treated with aerosol inhalation of budesonide combined with placebo, while the study group was treated with budesonide combined with montelukast sodium. Pulmonary function parameters, immunoglobulin, and recovery of related symptoms, along with the adverse reaction rate, were observed and compared between both groups. Results: Before treatment, there was no marked difference in pulmonary function parameters and immunoglobulin indexes between both groups (P > 0.05). All pulmonary function indicators and immunoglobulin indexes in both groups improved following therapy, with the study group outperforming the control group (P < 0.05). The recovery time of related symptoms in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was compared, with notable differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in the treatment of bronchial asthma has the value of clinical application and promotion.