The (photo)physical properties of organometallic complexes are crucially affected by relativistic effects. In a non- or scalar-relativistic picture, triplet states are threefold degenerate. Spin-orbit coupling lifts this degeneracy (zero-field splitting, ZFS) and enables phosphorescence from the three triplet-like states to the ground state. The fine structure and radiative lifetimes of phosphorescent organometallic complexes are important properties for designing efficient organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Here we show that experimental ZFSs and phosphorescent lifetimes for a large variety of organometallic complexes are well reproduced by self-consistent spin-orbit coupling TDDFT (SOC-TDDFT) calculations with a continuum solvation model. By comparing with perturbative SOC-TDDFT and gas phase calculations, we find that both full spin-orbit and solvation effects are important for the predicted properties. SOC-TDDFT is thus shown to be a useful predictive tool for the rational design of phosphors in OLEDs and other optoelectronic devices.
A comprehensive experimental and numerical study of concrete-filled double skin tubular (CFDST) stub columns is presented in this paper. A total of 23 tests was carried out on CFDST specimens with austenitic stainless steel circular hollow section (CHS) outer tubes, high strength steel CHS inner tubes, and three different grades of concrete infill (C40, C80 and C120). The ultimate load, load-deflection histories and failure modes of the stub columns are reported. The test results were employed in a parallel numerical simulation programme for the validation of the finite element (FE) model, by means of which an extensive parametric study was undertaken to extend the available results over a wide range of crosssection slendernesses, inner tube strengths and concrete grades. The experimentally and numerically derived data were then employed to assess the applicability of the existing European, Australian and North American design provisions for composite carbon steel members to the design of the studied CFDST cross-sections. Overall, the existing design rules are shown to provide generally safe-sided (less so for the higher concrete grades) but rather scattered capacity predictions. Use of an effective concrete strength is recommended for the higher concrete grades and shown to improve the consistency of the design capacity predictions.
The use of concrete-filled double skin tubular (CFDST) cross-sections for compression members has become increasingly popular in construction. A recently proposed innovative form of CFDST cross-section, ultilising stainless steel for the outer tube, offers the combined advantages of the composite action seen in CFDST member alongside the durability and ductility associated with stainless steel. CFDST sections with stainless steel outer tubes, for which there are currently little experimental data, are the focus of the present study. A comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the compressive behaviour of CFDST sections with square stainless steel outer tubes is presented in this paper. A total of 19 specimens was tested under uniform axial compression, and the test observations are fully reported. The ultimate loads, load-displacement curves and failure modes from the tests were used for the validation of finite element (FE) models. Parametric finite element analyses were then performed. The combined set of experimentally and numerically derived data was employed to assess the applicability of the existing European, Australian and American design 2 provisions for composite carbon steel members to the design of the studied CFDST crosssections. Overall, the existing design rules are shown to provide generally safe-sided (less so for the higher concrete grades) but rather scattered capacity predictions. Modifications to the current design codes are also considered-a higher buckling coefficient k of 10.67 to consider the beneficial restraining effect of the concrete on the local buckling of the stainless steel outer tubes, as well as a reduction factor η to reflect the reduced relative effectiveness of higher concrete grades. Overall, the comparisons demonstrated that improved accuracy and consistency were achieved when the modified design rules were applied.
A comprehensive experimental investigation into the axial compressive response of concretefilled double skin tubular (CFDST) sections with stainless steel square and rectangular outer tubes is presented. A total of 28 tests was carried out. The experimental setup and procedures are described, and the test observations are fully reported. The test results are employed to assess the applicability of the current European and North American design provisions for composite carbon steel members to the design of the studied CFDST cross-sections.Modifications to the current design codes are also considered-a higher buckling coefficient k of 10.67 to consider the beneficial restraining effect of the concrete on the local buckling of the stainless steel outer tubes and a reduction factor η to account for the effective compressive strength of high strength concrete. Overall, the comparisons revealed that the existing design rules may generally be safely applied to the prediction of the compressive resistance of CFDST cross-sections with stainless steel outer tubes, while the modified design rules offered greater accuracy and consistency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.