Diatoms are good indicators of water quality because of their great diversity and wide ecological range. They are also interesting in assessing the impact of radioactivity on ecosystems because of their capacity to absorb radioelements. They also show radio-induced deformities, observed in many species. In order to assess more precisely the impact of natural radioactivity, diatom communities were monitored during a 9-month survey in two mineral springs characterized by radioactivity levels ranging within two orders of magnitude. The experimental data obtained were analyzed using different multivariate and clustering analyses. The richness was high with the dominance of Planothidium frequentissimum and Crenotia angustior. In the most radioactive spring known in Auvergne (above 4000 Bq L-1 radon activity), the average deformation was 24.7%, in contrast with lower teratological rates observed in the less radioactive spring. In the absence of heavy metals, this result confirmed that radioactivity is an environmental stress for the diatoms living in these particular ecosystems. This conclusion was reinforced by the selection of springs from a database of 126 ecosystems comparable to our studied sites except the lower level of radioactivity. In these "mirror" springs, few deformations were observed.

No abstract

Diatoms colonised most aquatic ecosystems on earth from marine to freshwater ones, and also the springs containing a fairly large and poorly known diversity of diatoms.While investigations on the influence of substrates on diatom assemblages in rivers are relatively well documented, few studies have been done for mineral springs. The purpose of this study was to analyse if the type of substrate on which diatoms grow, influences diatom assemblage's ecological metrics (i.e. species richness, diversity and evenness) and diatom composition. During 18 months, two minerals springs of Auvergne (France), La Montagne and Mariol were sampled monthly, both epilithic and epipelic diatom communities. A total of 201 taxa were found. Data analysis showed that location (i.e. environmental variables of a site) explained significantly higher portions of variability of diatom composition than substrate. However, substrate have a role in the species abundances as much as the location.