This study examines and analyzes the legal subject of the Ujung Pandang Central Market management activities, which are treated as Non-Residential Condominium buildings based on Law No. 20 of 2011. This research combines normative juridical and empirical research methods. The primary data were collected using direct interviews, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research were then analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the legal subject of the Ujung Pandang Central Market management activities, which are treated as Non-Residential Condominium buildings, must be held by PPPSRS based on Article 59 of Law No. 20 of 2011. In this case, if PPPSRS has not been established, then PT. MTIR must establish PPPSRS no later than one year from the first delivery of the condominium unit to the owner. However, until now, PPPSRS has not been established and established by PT. MTIR. So strictly speaking, PT. MTIR deviated from its obligations in implementing Law No. 20 of 2011. Therefore, it is recommended that the Makassar Municipal Government re-evaluate the involvement of PT. MTIR as Holder of The Right to Build for Ujung Pandang Central Market. In addition, it is recommended to PT. MTIR to comply with Article 59 of Law No. 20 of 2011 by establishing PPPSRS. Furthermore, it is hoped that law enforcement and the Regional House of Representatives of Makassar Municipal will protect the interests of traders so that PPPSRS is established as a legal subject for the Ujung Pandang Central Market management activities.

The ever-increasing domestic consumption of plastic products and materials has forced Indonesia to propel forward the means and approaches in dealing with their disposals. Despite the presence of numerous legal instruments serving as basis justifying actions to deal with plastic waste, Indonesia is still nowhere near success in tackling the issue of mismanagement. This article is devoted to normatively analyze various legal approaches used to govern plastic waste management Indonesia, and to unravel issues related to such approaches. It is carried out using normative-legal research methods in which various legal instruments and other secondary legal materials are analyzed descriptively to point out the emerging legal issues. The main findings reveal that laws and regulations as well as public policies that serve as legal basis and approach to deal with plastic waste governance in Indonesia still possess some weaknesses. Further examinations suggest the needs for improvement in some legal aspects from which some new perspectives could then be shaped to envisage future actions.

Penetapan kawasan hutan laposo niniconang menyebabkan konflik agraria antara masyarakat dan Pemerintah selama bertahun-tahun. Hal tersebut menimbulkan ketidakpastian hak atas tanah karena masyarakat yang tinggal di kawasan hutan kehilangan sumber penghidupan yang telah dikelola secara turun-temurun. Atas dasar persoalan tersebut dilakukan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar hukum masyarakat melakukan penguasaan tanah. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah kajian yuridis empiris. Penelitian artikel ini menggnakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris, menggunakan hasil wawancara untuk diolah an dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan hukum. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penguasaan tanah yang dilakukan masyarakat meyakinkan bahwa tanah yang mereka kuasai adalah hak milik masyarakat setempat. Akan tetapi, banyaknya petani yang ditangkap membuat kekhawatiran untuk mengelola lahan tersebut. Oleh sebab itu, melalui penelitian ini maka disimpulkan bahwa kebijakan reforma agraria yang komprehensif dibutuhkan untuk penyelesaian konflik-konflik semacam ini. AbstrakThe implications of establishing a forest of Laposo Niniconang Watangsoppeng on the protection of people’s rights to land. This research aims to find out and analyze the status of land rights controlled for generations. The research type is empirical legal research where data collection is carried out by interview methods on several related parties. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Furthermore, the data is analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results showed that traditional societies having lived for generations managing land in forest areas are worried about being arrested by the police. Reflecting on the site, a comprehensive agrarian reform policy is needed for the resolution of forest conflicts.

This research aims to find out the ideal role of justice collaborators in disclosing corruption cases. This research is empirical law research. This research's primary and secondary data are categorized according to the data type before being analyzed using qualitative methods, i.e., analyzing data related to the problem being studied, then selecting based on logical thinking to avoid errors in the data analysis process. The findings show that the ideal form of the role of justice collaborator depends largely on how far the commitment of the apparatus in providing legal protection to the, how firm the willingness of law enforcement agencies and rule-makers to make a clear, firm, and the complete rule of law regarding justice collaborators. In addition, a clear article should be added to the Corruption Criminal Case about the reward for justice collaborators.