To compare the amount of the kidney displacement in the complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) to the prone PCNL during getting renal access. Thirty-three patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in group A were placed in the complete supine position and the patients in group B in the prone position. Amounts of the kidney displacement in three states and other data were analyzed. The mean amount of the kidney displacement in the complete supine PCNL was 10.1 ± 7.9 mm in stage 1, 10.7 ± 8.28 mm in stage 2 and 12.2 ± 10.4 mm in stage 3. The mean amount of the kidney displacement in prone PCNL was 16.6 ± 5.8 mm in stage 1, 16.2 ± 6.3 mm in stage 2 and 17.6 ± 6.7 mm in stage 3. In stages 1 and 2, a significant difference between the two groups derived from the mean amount of the kidney displacement, but the difference was not statistically significant in stage 3. Adjusted for age, gender, BMI, stone burden and position of PCNL, prone position was a predictor caused significantly more displacement in all three stages. Among other predictors, only BMI had a significant effect on the amount of the kidney displacement (in stages 2 and 3). Performing PCNL in the complete supine position is safe and effective and leads to less kidney displacement during getting renal access and therefore, it may be considered in most patients requiring PCNL.

Objectives –Aspiration of synovial fluid from non-effusive joints is undertaken for the diagnosis of crystal-associated arthritis, biomarker analysis, and to confirm intraarticular positioning. We hypothesized that pneumatic compression of the non-effusive knee would mobilize occult synovial fluid and improve arthrocentesis success. Methods – The absence of a knee effusion was determined by physical examination, imaging, and exclusion of confounding disease.  Conventional arthrocentesis was performed in 111 consecutive non-effusive knees and arthrocentesis volume (milliliters) determined. Pneumatic compression was then applied, and arthrocentesis was resumed. Results – Pneumatic compression improved fluid yield: conventional: 0.4±1.0 ml, compression: 1.8±2.5 ml (319% increase, 95% CI  -1.9<-1.4<-0.9; p=0.0001). Pneumatic compression reduced arthrocentesis failure (< 0.1 ml) from 74.8% (83/111) to 41.4% (46/111) (p=0.0001) and improved successful arthrocentesis in terms of adequate synovial fluid yield: 1) ≥ 0.1 ml from 25.2% (28/111) to 58.5% (65/111) (+132%, p=0.0001), 2) ≥ 0.5 ml from 22.5% (25/111) to 57.7% (64/111) (+156%, p =0.0001), 3) ≥ 2.0 ml from 11.7% (13/111) to 47.7% (53/111) (+300%, p =0.0001), and 4) ≥ 3.0 ml from 5.4% (6/111) to 36.0% (40/111) (+319%, p =0.0001). Conclusions: Pneumatic compression of the non-effusive knee improves the extraction of synovial fluid of various requisite volumes for conventional and biomarker analysis.

Aim: Complete arthrocentesis of the effusive knee ameliorates patient pain, reduces intra-articular and intraosseous pressure, removes inflammatory cytokines, and has been shown to substantially improve the therapeutic outcomes of intra-articular injections. However, conventional arthrocentesis incompletely decompresses the knee, leaving considerable residual synovial fluid in the intra-articular space. The present study determined whether external pneumatic circumferential compression of the effusive knee permitted more successful arthrocentesis and complete joint decompression.Methods: Using a paired sample design, 50 consecutive effusive knees underwent conventional arthrocentesis and then arthrocentesis with pneumatic compression.Pneumatic compression was applied to the superior knee using a conventional thigh blood pressure cuff inflated to 100 mm Hg which compressed the suprapatellar bursa and patellofemoral joint, forcing fluid from the superior knee to the anterolateral portal where the fluid could be accessed. Arthrocentesis success and fluid yield in mL before and after pneumatic compression were determined.Results: Successful diagnostic arthrocentesis (≥3 mL) of the effusive knee was 82% (41/50) with conventional arthrocentesis and increased to 100% (50/50) with pneumatic compression (P = .001). Synovial fluid yields increased by 144% (19.8 ± 17.1 mL)

No abstract