Background and aimsAppendiceal neoplasms are uncommon entities that are usually determined incidentally during the histopathological examination. Different techniques used for the macroscopic sampling of appendectomy material may affect the determinating neoplasms.Materials and methodsH&E-stained slides of 1280 cases who underwent appendectomy between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively for histopathological features.ResultsNeoplasms were determined in 28 cases (3.09%); 1 lesion was observed in the proximal part of the appendix, 1 covering the entire length from proximal to distal and 26 in the distal part. In the 26 cases that observed in the distal part, the lesion was seen on both sides of the longitudinal section of the distal appendix in 20 cases, while it was seen on only one distal longitudinal section in the remaining 6 cases.ConclusionThe vast majority of appendiceal neoplasms are seen in the distal part of the appendix, and, in some cases, neoplasms might be seen on only one side of the distal section. Sampling only one-half of the distal part of the appendix, where tumours are most often observed, could result in some neoplasms being missed. Therefore, sampling the whole distal part would be more beneficial to determine small diameter tumours that do not create macroscopic findings.

Background: Although neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common genetical disorder, symptoms due to neural involvement are rare among infants and children. Ganglioneuromas are slow-growing tumors and can be seen in patients with NF1. However, bilateral symmetrical involvement is very rarely reported in the literature. We present a rare pediatric case with NF1 who presented with upper cervical bilateral symmetrical ganglioneuroma. Case presentation: A 7-year-old male presented with progressive gait disturbance, falls, and bilateral limb and trunk numbness that started several weeks ago. Physical examination revealed generalized café au lait spots, neurofibromas, and axillary and inguinal freckling. Family history for NF1 was positive. Neurological examination showed slight paraparesis and hypoesthesia of the upper extremities with C4-C5 dermatomas being more distinct. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed contrast enhancing dumbbell-shaped symmetrical lesions originating from both C3 nerve roots extending to C2-C5 vertebral body levels. There was a significant spinal cord compression causing myelopathy as well as dystrophic changes and kyphotic deformity at those levels. The patient was operated and the lesions were totally excised via C2-3-4 laminoplasty. Histopathological evaluation reported the lesion as ganglioneuroma. Following the surgery for excision of the lesions, the patient presented with rapidly progressing kyphotic deformity and underwent rigid craniocervical fusion. Conclusion: Ganglioneuromas are seen among children, tend to occur in the mediastinum, abdomen, and retroperitoneal area, and may accompany NF1. Cervical spinal ganglioneuroma, however, is a very rare entity. Coexistence of NF1 and bilateral symmetrical cervical ganglioneuroma is highly unusual. Like neurofibromas, ganglioneuromas are slow-growing tumors and therefore they are not expected to cause myelopathy and related symptoms during childhood. Symmetrical nature of the lesions results in myelopathy and early onset of symptoms. Due to the risk of postoperative increase of kyphotic angulation, laminoplasty should be considered. Although laminoplasty alone does not prevent the progression of kyphotic changes, the procedure may allow the use of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks for future surgeries to correct the deformity.

Objective: To evaluate and discuss the outcomes of a combination of ventriculocystostomy (VC) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for obstructive hydrocephalus (HCP) due to ventricular/cisternal arachnoid cysts, and only ETV for obstructive HCP due to different etiologies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 40 symptomatic patients (aged 4 months – 61 years) of obstructive HCP treated by ETV or VC+ETV during October 2014 – April 2019. VC+ETV was performed in 7 patients with intraventricular/cisternal arachnoid cyst and obstructive HCP. Only ETV was performed in 33 patients with obstructive HCP due to other etiologies. Results: Successful ETV or VC+ETV surgery was performed in 35 patients. The procedure failed in 5 patients aged < 1 year; all these 5 patients had a head circumference (HC) of > 90 percentile at the time of surgery. Another 5 patients aged < 1 year showed successful ETV, with a HC of 75–90 percentiles. Conclusion: ETV is a successful alternative treatment for obstructive HCP. The ventricular size may not demonstrate a remarkable reduction post-ETV than post-shunting. Accordingly, increased intracranial pressure may not effectively decrease during the early period post-ETV than post-shunting. Therefore, the success rates of VC and/or ETV are low in very young patients with very high HCs (> 90 percentile).

No abstract