Space is the most effective tool to inspire architectural students. Architectural thinking usually uses a standard space prototype, giving no respect for students` learning styles. The scope has covered a deductive framework within a survey that started with a learning styles questionnaire and ended with an applicable descriptive study with a sample of architectural students to frame their environmental preferences according to their learning style. The methodology utilized multiple data accumulations as questionnaires, interviewing participants individually and noting their descriptions of their favorite inspiring spaces. Afterward, the data investigation was designated using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) for data analysis and the Midjourney AI server in the text-to-image generation stage. The initial results showed how much architectural students prefer the reflector learning style. Although participants are different in gender and locality distribution, most showed a clear tendency to the inspiring personal space. Remarkably, the intermission space showed a higher preference frequency than the presentation space, which reflects the self-motivated nature of inspiration. In contrast, all participants showed little interest in inspiring collaboration or making spaces. Consequently, the analysis concluded a descriptive study minding the characteristics of different categories of personal spaces described by architectural 169

Life in the architectural design studio is about the acquisition of experience during the cooperative architectural practice Scholars have observed that cooperation between students is the most effective tool in architectural learning. In this scope, the study aims to compare the cooperative spirit of teamwork practice with the solo practice in a biomimetic project-based workshop to measure the influence of cooperation on students` productivity and anxiety state, considering gender, locality, and the state of siblings as influencing factors. The methodology intends to employ a qualitative comparative analysis to indicate the transformation of students` productivity in a biomimetic design workshop after switching from a solo practice to a cooperative peer learning application as well as an embracement for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) test during both practices during two workshops for architectural students from different academic levels emphasizing biomimetic design principles and Nature thinking. The results outlined the positive impact of cooperative biomimetic practice on students` accomplishments and anxiety state.