IntroductionEmbryology forms a valuable part of the medical school curriculum. However, medical students traditionally struggle with revising embryology and appreciating its relevance. Condensing the teaching content, implementing peer-teaching methods, and increasing clinical focus in curricula have been suggested as methods to improve student engagement.MethodsMedical students at two universities were taught a condensed version of the embryological curriculum in 2 hours by final-year medical students. Students’ confidence with the topics covered in the embryological curricula was assessed using anonymized precourse and postcourse questionnaires. Students were asked to further evaluate the quality, delivery, and content of the teaching in the postcourse questionnaire and were given the opportunity to provide written comments. All questions consisted of a statement stem and a five-point Likert scale.ResultsStudents scored significantly higher levels of confidence with embryology after implementation of the course. They found the talk to be effectively delivered, clear, and relevant to their examinations.ConclusionWe have demonstrated that it is possible to design and produce an embryology teaching program that covers an undergraduate embryology curriculum in a chronological systems-based manner in 2 hours with successful results.

IntroductionThe UK Pharmaceutical Industry is arguably one of the most important industries to consider in the negotiations following the Brexit vote. Providing tens of thousands of jobs and billions in tax revenue and research investment, the importance of this industry cannot be understated. At stake is the global leadership in the sector, which produces some of the field’s most influential basic science and translation work. However, interruptions and losses may occur at multiple levels, affecting patients, researchers, universities, companies and government.GoalsBy understanding the current state of pharmaceutical sector, the potential effect of leaving the European Union (EU) on this successful industry can be better understood. This paper aims to address the priorities for negotiations by collating the analyses of professionals in the field, leading companies and non-EU member states.Research methodsA government healthcare policy advisor and Chief Science Officer (CSO) for a major pharmaceutical firm were consulted to scope the paper. In these discussions, five key areas were identified: contribution, legislative processes, regulatory processes, research and outcomes, commercial risk. Multiple search engines were utilised for selecting relevant material, predominantly PubMed and Google Scholar. To supplement this information, Government documents were located using the “GOV.UK” publications tool, and interviews and commentaries were found through the Google News search function.ConclusionWith thorough investigation of the literature, we propose four foundations in the advancement of negotiations. These prioritise: negotiation of ‘associated country’ status, bilaterally favourable trade agreements, minimal interruption to regulatory bodies and special protection for the movement of workforce in the life sciences industry.

This study highlights the need for clinicians to take into account the indication for surgery as a major psychological factor in patients' perception of self and experience of surgery. It demonstrates that bilateral immediate reconstruction patients report similar physical symptoms irrespective of indication for mastectomy, but the decision-making process in terms of risk-balancing and diagnosis influences satisfaction with self and surgery. It underlines the importance of preoperative management of expectations for patients undergoing risk-reducing procedures.

Background: Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is a standard oncoplastic technique utilising aesthetic breast reduction principles to facilitate tumour resection and breast reshaping. Simultaneous contralateral mammaplasties are often performed to maintain symmetry. BCCT.core software, which principally assesses breast symmetry, has been previously employed for evaluating cosmetic results after standard breast conservation therapy and latterly TMs for upper pole tumours. The purpose of this study was to validate this novel tool for TMs in all breast zones.Methods: Standardised photographs of 20 consecutive patients who underwent TM were evaluated for symmetry using BCCT.core versus a plastic surgical panel completing a visual analogue scale. Results were rated as (excellent/good/fair/poor). Outcomes between the two methods were compared.Results: Twenty patients aged 37 to 63 years with a median 36G bra size had 22 TMs (18 unilateral, 2 bilateral). Indications were invasive breast cancer (87%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (13%). The median (range) tumour size was 22.5 mm (6-90 mm) with a resection weight of 245.8 g (16-1,079 g).Primary nipple pedicles were superomedial (63%), inferior (21%) and superolateral (16%). Five patients required a secondary glandular pedicle for volume redistribution to maintain breast shape. The BCCT.core software vs. panel symmetry assessments were 37% vs. 39% (excellent), 63% vs. 50% (good) and 0% vs. 11% (fair). Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank tests and Spearman rank correlations found the pairings to be statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusions: Despite small patient numbers, BCCT.core gave comparable findings with the panel and is thus useful for objectively assessing cosmesis of TMs in all breast zones.

Purpose To investigate whether the use of a VR arthroscopic simulator can influence medical students’ attitudes toward a career in orthopaedic surgery. Methods Twenty-five medical students completed seven unsupervised sessions on a VR hip-arthroscopic simulator. All participants completed a pre-simulator and post-simulator pseudo-anonymized questionnaire consisting of 10 questions: six 10-point Likert scale questions addressing their interest in orthopaedics, surgery, and arthroscopy; and four 5-point Likert scale questions addressing their attitudes toward simulation. Prepaired and postpaired datasets were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Interest in both orthopaedics and surgery was found to increase after simulator use (orthopaedics: 5.3 ± .3 to 8.4 ± .2, P = .0001; surgery: 5.8 ± .3 to 9.0 ± .2; P = .0001). It was also found that simulator use increased participants’ interest in arthroscopy (5.4 ± .3 to 8.0 ± .3; P = .0001) and hip-arthroscopy (5.0 ± .3 to 7.6 ± .3; P = .0001). Participants reported they were more likely to attend endoscopic and arthroscopic surgical lists after simulator use (endoscopic: 6.9 ± .3 to 8.4 ± .2; P = .0003; arthroscopic: 5.9 ± .3 to 8.4 ± .2; P = .0001). After using the simulator, participants felt more strongly that VR simulation is a valuable training modality ( P = .0025), that simulation should be a mandatory part of orthopaedics and surgical training ( P = .0001 and P = .0001), and that access to VR simulators improves the quality of surgical training ( P = .0024). Conclusions These results demonstrate that exposure to VR arthroscopic simulation increased medical students’ interest in orthopaedics, surgery, and arthroscopy, without the need for direct supervision. Following VR simulator use, students reported they were more likely to engage with training opportunities, including arthroscopic and endoscopic surgery. Clinical Relevance Understanding factors that stimulate interest in orthopaedic surgery may help programs attract the broadest pool of potential trainees.