Introduction Composite phaeochromocytoma is a tumour containing a separate tumour of neuronal origin in addition to a chromaffin cell tumour. This study reports on two cases from a single centre’s records and presents a systematic literature review of composite phaeochromocytomas. Methods In addition to describing 2 case reports, a systematic search of the Medline database from inception up to April 2020 was done for human case reports on composite phaeochromocytomas. Relevant titles and/or abstracts were screened, and full texts were reviewed to identify appropriate studies. Data was extracted and a descriptive analysis of presentation, clinical features, management strategies and outcomes was performed. The quality of included studies was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist. Results There were 62 studies included, with a total of 94 patients. Of 91 patients where data was available, the median (range) age of patients was 48 (4–86) years. Of 90 patients where information was provided, 57% were female. In at least 28% of patients, a genetic cause was identified. Common presenting features include abdominal pain, palpable mass, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal symptoms. The most common tumour component with phaeochromocytoma is ganglioneuroma; other components include ganglioneuroblastoma, neuroblastoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. In patients with follow-up data (n=48), 85% of patients were alive and well at a median (range) follow-up time of 18 (0.5–168) months. Conclusion Composite phaeochromocytoma is a rare tumour, with a significant genetic predisposition. This review summarises available epidemiological data, which will be useful for clinicians managing this rare condition.

No abstract

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is becoming increasingly documented. It was first described in relation to autoimmune pancreatitis. Features of the disease include tissue infiltration by IgG4 plasma cells with associated fibrosis and the growth of pseudotumours. A 71-year-old woman presented with increasing right cheek swelling and mild proptosis. Ten years earlier, she had a similar presentation and was diagnosed with an inflammatory pseudotumour. Examination revealed a lesion in the right nasal cavity. CT and MRI confirmed a mass within the right maxillary antrum extending into the nasal cavity. Endoscopic biopsies showed florid plasma cell infiltrate with marked increase in IgG+ plasma cells. Immunostaining expressed IgG4 (70%). She was started on a course of prednisolone and her symptoms resolved. IgG4-RD is becoming an emerging disease entity. Its involvement in the paranasal sinuses can mimic nasal tumours. Major surgical resection should be avoided as patients can often be treated medically.

Background Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM. Methods NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life. Discussion NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world. Trial registration NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978.

We present a case of synchronous renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Our case was a true collision tumor and both components were high grade. Metastasis to the adrenal gland by the urothelial carcinoma was observed. The morphologic impression was confirmed with GATA3 expression by the urothelial carcinoma component and PAX8 expression by the renal cell carcinoma component. We have reviewed the contemporary literature of this unusual dual diagnosis.