Using a bull's-eye hierarchical mapping technique (HMT), the present study examined placement of parents in adults' attachment networks over time. We hypothesised that attachment style would predict distance at which network members (mother, father, romantic partner) would be placed from the core-self over time. Participants completed the HMT on two occasions, 12-months apart. Attachment style explained unique variance, beyond that accounted for by individual and relationship characteristics, in distance of mother, father, and partner concurrently and for mother over time. Unsatisfactory attachment relationships with father and partner and those marked by higher attachment insecurity were more likely to be excluded from attachment networks over time. Findings suggest that attachment style, relationship quality, romantic relationship status, and parents' marital status determine the placement of parents in adults' attachment networks.Keywords: attachment; attachment networks; parents; attachment style; longitudinal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
Attachment Networks over TimeAttachment is a life-long phenomenon (Bowlby, 1969) and parents remain attachment figures into adulthood (Ainsworth, 1985). Beginning in middle childhood, attachment functions gradually transfer from parents to peers beginning with proximity-seeking, then safe haven (providing care to reduce distress), and ending with the secure base (supporting exploration) (Seibert & Kerns, 2009; Zeifman & Hazan, 2010). The reorganization of attachment to parents is prompted by two psychosocial challenges in adolescence: establishing autonomy and achieving interdependence (Collins & Steinberg, 2006). One outcome of these normative developmental processes is that peers are included in the attachment network, the group of relationships in which the individual (seeks to) experiences comfort and security with attachment figures (Ainsworth, 1985).Within the attachment network, attachment figures are organized in a hierarchical structure (e.g., Rowe & Carnelley, 2005; Trinke & Bartholomew, 1997). Studies indicate that attachment networks are fluid and dynamic in structure, changing over time (e.g., Friedlmeier & Granqvist, 2006; Mayseless, 2004; Zeifman & Hazan, 2010). The primary, or most important, attachment figure occupies the uppermost position above a number of subsidiary figures. For older adolescents and adults, mothers tend to occupy the first or second position, after romantic partners (e.g., Rosenthal & Kobak, 2010; Trinke & Bartholomew, 1997). In contrast, fathers are lower down in the hierarchy and are more likely than mothers to be relinquished as peer attachments are added to the network (Rosenthal & Kobak, 2010). Indeed, fathers -and mothers -do not feature in the attachment hierarchies of some adolescents and adults (e.g., Antonucci, Akiyama, & ...