Urine output response to furosemide within 24 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass predicts cardiac surgery-induced acute kidney injury development and other important morbidity in children younger than 90 days old; prospective validation is warranted.

Purpose Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP) is an effective yet underutilized biomedical tool for adolescents and young adults’ (AYA) HIV prevention due to barriers such as PrEP adherence. We assessed HIV prevention knowledge, attitudes and beliefs from adults who self-identified as a primary support person to an AYA. Methods We surveyed AYA primary support persons at an academic hospital. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were completed to identify factors associated with the belief AYAs engaging in HIV-associated behaviors should use PrEP and willingness to support AYAs on PrEP. Results 200 primary support persons completed the survey. Participants were predominately female (77%) and black (56%). Nearly all primary support persons believed AYAs engaging in HIV-associated behaviors should take PrEP (94%) and 98% would support an AYA taking PrEP via transportation to appointments, assistance with refilling prescriptions, medication reminders, or encouragement. Conclusions Primary support persons are willing to support AYAs using PrEP.

Background: Prior research has explored the patterns and dynamics of homelessness; such an understanding is necessary to improve policy and programmatic responses and prevent new episodes of housing instability. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to identify correlates of veterans’ transitions into housing instability and inform initiatives aimed to address their needs, with a focus on how to prevent new episodes of housing instability. Methods: The cohort for this study includes 4,633,069 veterans who responded to the Veterans Health Administration’s universal screen for housing instability at least twice between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2016; 1.2% reported recent housing instability and 98.8% reported ongoing housing stability. The χ2 or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate, compared veterans’ characteristics by housing status. A multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors associated with recent housing instability, controlling for sociodemographic, military service, diagnostic, and health services use variables. Results: Sociodemographic and health services use variables increased veterans’ odds of transitioning into housing instability. The diagnoses with the greatest effect sizes were drug use disorder (adjusted odds ratio=1.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.45–1.55) and opioid use disorder, which was associated with a >2-fold increase in the odds of experiencing recent housing instability (adjusted odds ratio=2.22, 95% confidence interval: 2.04–2.41). Conclusions: The present study provides evidence to inform existing and future interventions to prevent new episodes of housing instability. Veterans with opioid use disorder were at greatest risk of becoming unstably housed; increasing access to medication-assisted treatment in homeless-focused services is needed.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Health insurance status is associated with differences in access to healthcare and health outcomes. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that among infants born in the United States, maternal private insurance compared with public Medicaid insurance would be associated with a lower infant mortality rate (IMR). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This ecological study used data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER expanded linked birth and infant death records database 2017-2018. We included hospital-born infants from 20 to 42 weeks of gestational age (wga) if the mother had either private or Medicaid insurance. We excluded infants with congenital anomalies and infants who died due to congenital anomalies. We used negative-binomial regression adjusted for race, sex, multiple birth, and any maternal pregnancy risk factors (as defined by the CDC) to determine the difference in IMR between private and Medicaid insurance. Chi-square or Fishers exact test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We included 6,901,328 infants; 53.6% had private insurance and 46.4% were insured by Medicaid. Privately insured infants had a lower IMR compared with Medicaid insured infants (2.84/1000 vs. 5.32/1000; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.71; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.62 to 0.81; p<.0001). The privately insured had higher rates of 1st trimester prenatal care compared to those with Medicaid (85.6% vs. 66.6%; p<.00001). Rates of infant morbidity and maternal morbidity (per CDC definitions) were lower among the privately insured compared to those with Medicaid (both p<.00001). The privately insured had lower rates of preterm (9.1% vs. 11.0%), extremely preterm (0.5% vs. 0.7%), low birth weight (7.1% vs. 9.6%), and extremely low birth weight (0.5% vs. 0.7%) births compared to those with Medicaid (all p<0.001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Private insurance is associated with a lower IMR compared to Medicaid insurance. Privately insured pregnancies also have higher rates of early prenatal care, less morbidity, and less preterm and low birth weight births. There may be opportunities to improve access to care and pregnancy outcomes among Medicaid insured pregnancies in the United States.

No abstract