Background The achievement of the World Health Organization's END TB goals will depend on the successful implementation of strategies for early diagnosis and retention of patients on effective therapy until cure. An estimated 150,000 cases are missed annually in South Africa. It is necessary to look at means for identifying these missed cases. This requires the implementation of active surveillance for TB, a policy adopted by the National Department of Health. Aim To explore the views of managers of the TB program on the implementation of active surveillance for TB in the resource constrained setting of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Methods A descriptive, explorative, thematically analysed qualitative study based on 10 semi-structured interviews of managers of the TB program. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method and Atlas-ti. Results Active case finding of people attending health facilities was the dominant approach, although screening by community health workers (CHWs) was available. Both government and non-government organisations employed CHWs to screen door to door and sometimes as part of campaigns or community events. Some CHWs focused only on contact tracing or people that were non-adherent to TB treatment. Challenges for CHWs included poor coordination and duplication of services, failure to investigate those identified in the community, lack of transport and supportive supervision as well as security issues. Successes included expanding coverage by government CHW teams, innovations to improve screening, strategies to improve CHW capability and attention to social determinants.

Background: The high burden of tuberculosis (TB) in South Africa (SA) is associated with uncontrolled transmission in communities and delayed diagnosis of active cases. Active surveillance for TB is provided by community-based services (CBS). Research is required to understand key factors influencing TB screening services in the CBS. This study explored the implementation of active surveillance for TB where community-oriented primary care (COPC) had been successfully implemented to identify these factors.Methods: This was a qualitative study of four established COPC sites across two provinces in SA where active surveillance for TB is implemented. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected healthcare workers in the CBS and citizens in these communities. The recorded interviews were transcribed for data analysis using ATLAS.ti software.Results: The factors influencing active surveillance for TB were directly related to the major players in the delivery of CBS. These factors interacted in a complex network influencing implementation of active surveillance for TB. Building effective relationships across stakeholder platforms by community health workers (CHWs) was directly influenced by the training, capacity building afforded these CHWs by the district health services; and acceptability of CBS. Each factor interplayed with others to influence active surveillance for TB.Conclusion: Community health workers were central to the success of active surveillance for TB. The complex interactions of the social determinants of health and TB transmission in communities required CHWs to develop trusting relationships that responded to these issues that have impact on TB disease and linked clients to healthcare.