Objectives: Infantile acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding involves a decision for therapeutic intervention that most pediatricians first coming into contact with the patient are, not unreasonably, unable to objectively provide. Therefore, some objective tools of individual risk assessment would seem to be crucial. The principal aim of the present study was to investigate the anamnestic and clinical parameters of infants with hematemesis, together with laboratory and instrumental findings, to create a scoring system that may help identify those infants requiring an appropriate and timely application of upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy.Methods: Clinical data of infants admitted for hematemesis to the participating centers over the study period were systematically collected. According to the outcome dealing with rebleeding, need for blood transfusion, mortality, finding of GI bleeding lesions, or need for surgical intervention, patients were blindly divided into a group with major clinical severity and a group with minor clinical severity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to investigate significant prognostic factors for clinical severity.Results: According to our findings, we drafted a practical diagnostic algorithm and a clinical score able to predict the need for timely upper GI endoscopy (BLOVO infant score). Our clinical scoring system was created by incorporating anamnestic factors, clinical parameters, and laboratory findings that emerged as predictors of a worst outcome. Conclusions:We provided the first objective tool of individual risk assessment for infants with hematemesis, which could be very useful for pediatricians first coming into contact with the patient in the emergency department.

The interest and application of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are increasing. Numerous studies have shown that MSUS is more sensitive than clinical examination for detecting subclinical synovitis. MSUS is a well-accepted tool, easily accessible and non-irradiating. Therefore, it is a useful technique throughout JIA management. In the diagnostic work-up, MSUS allows for better characterizing the inflammatory involvement. It helps to define the disease extension, improving the classification of patients into JIA subtypes. Moreover, it is an essential tool for guiding intra-articular and peritendinous procedures. Finally, during the follow-up, in detecting subclinical disease activity, MSUS can be helpful in therapeutic decision-making. Because of several peculiarities related to the growing skeleton, the MSUS standards defined for adults do not apply to children. During the last decade, many teams have made large efforts to define normal and pathological US features in children in different age groups, which should be considered during the US examination. This review describes the specificities of MSUS in children, its applications in clinical practice, and its integration into the new JIA treat-to-target therapeutic approach.