As life expectation is prolonged and the elderly population increases, we are witnessing a growth in the number of prosthesis implanted; therefore, an increase in interprosthetic femoral fractures can be expected in the next future. For this reason, a proper and specific classification system needs to be. Nowadays, depending on the localization of the fracture, Vancouver or Rorabeck classifications are used, and some attempts have been made to create a new one or adjust and adapt the previously mentioned systems. However, there is no unique classification system that is accepted worldwide. The goal would be a classification that permits identifying the correct surgical treatment based on the type of interprosthetic femoral fracture. A pragmatic grading scale to provide a standardised approach, so that the best possible outcomes could be achieved. Despite minimal diffusion, in our opinion the Pires classification system should be universally accepted and used.

Background: Facet Joint Syndrome (FJS) is a common progressive disease affecting small joints of the spine and can have painful symptoms. When conservative treatment measures fail, there are a wide range of interventional procedures that can be used. Varied results have been obtained with different procedures, and standardized indications and guidelines are unclear. The authors aimed to review the most current evidence on indications, utilization of interventional procedures, results, and complication risks for the treatment of FJS. Methods: Customized structured electronic searches were performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases. Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCT), and systematic reviews on FJS treated with interventional minimally invasive procedures published from 1st of January 2015 to 29th of February 2020 were included. We initially selected 320 studies, and 25 studies (two meta-analyses, six systematic reviews, and 17 RCT) were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A certain amount of improvement of pain was reported in 100% of the patients, with no significant complications reported. Most studies showed efficacy of all interventional procedures at all levels of evidence, without providing definitive data on indications and superiority of one procedure over others. Conclusions: The authors suggest a standardized stepladder approach to the management of FJS, with conservative measures initially and interventional procedures if those measures fail. All procedures were reported to be safe and efficient when clinically indicated and properly performed. Further studies with appropriate methodology are needed. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Increasing age expectations and number of joint replacement procedures have made interprosthetic femoral fractures (IFF) a progressively more common diagnosis and a challenge for surgeons. A gold standard and universally accepted classifications and guidelines do not exist yet. Customized structured electronic searches performed in PubMed database. Relevant key terms: IFF, classification interprosthetic fracture, peri-implant femoral fracture, biomechanics interprosthetic femur fracture, radiographic femur fracture, risk factor IFF. 42 articles finally included (up to 2019). High morbidity and mortality linked to IFF. Standardised classifications, management guidelines and surgical approaches are not available yet. Periprosthetic classification systems are still utilized even if not entirely appropriate. High rate of failure is related to thinner cortical bone, larger medullary canals and variable stresses depending on the distance among implants. High complication rates in all studies. Stress risers and implant stability based on fracture patterns and stress forces. Several surgical options with no uniformity. Less invasive surgical procedures are associated to reduction of metalwork failure rate, better preservation of vascularization and better functional-clinical outcomes. Lack of specific classification systems and management guidelines. Several surgical options are available with no uniformity of results. Attention to stress risers and preservation of bone stock and vascularization are key aspects for better results.