The use of small unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based structure-from-motion (SfM; photogrammetry) and LiDAR point clouds has been widely discussed in the remote sensing community. Here, we compared multiple aspects of the SfM and the LiDAR point clouds, collected concurrently in five UAS flights experimental fields of a short crop (snap bean), in order to explore how well the SfM approach performs compared with LiDAR for crop phenotyping. The main methods include calculating the cloud-to-mesh distance (C2M) maps between the preprocessed point clouds, as well as computing a multiscale model-to-model cloud comparison (M3C2) distance maps between the derived digital elevation models (DEMs) and crop height models (CHMs). We also evaluated the crop height and the row width from the CHMs and compared them with field measurements for one of the data sets. Both SfM and LiDAR point clouds achieved an average RMSE of ~0.02 m for crop height and an average RMSE of ~0.05 m for row width. The qualitative and quantitative analyses provided proof that the SfM approach is comparable to LiDAR under the same UAS flight settings. However, its altimetric accuracy largely relied on the number and distribution of the ground control points.

Accurate, precise, and timely estimation of crop yield is key to a grower’s ability to proactively manage crop growth and predict harvest logistics. Such yield predictions typically are based on multi-parametric models and in-situ sampling. Here we investigate the extension of a greenhouse study, to low-altitude unmanned aerial systems (UAS). Our principal objective was to investigate snap bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris) yield using imaging spectroscopy (hyperspectral imaging) in the visible to near-infrared (VNIR; 400–1000 nm) region via UAS. We aimed to solve the problem of crop yield modelling by identifying spectral features explaining yield and evaluating the best time period for accurate yield prediction, early in time. We introduced a Python library, named Jostar, for spectral feature selection. Embedded in Jostar, we proposed a new ranking method for selected features that reaches an agreement between multiple optimization models. Moreover, we implemented a well-known denoising algorithm for the spectral data used in this study. This study benefited from two years of remotely sensed data, captured at multiple instances over the summers of 2019 and 2020, with 24 plots and 18 plots, respectively. Two harvest stage models, early and late harvest, were assessed at two different locations in upstate New York, USA. Six varieties of snap bean were quantified using two components of yield, pod weight and seed length. We used two different vegetation detection algorithms. the Red-Edge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (RENDVI) and Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), to subset the fields into vegetation vs. non-vegetation pixels. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was used as the regression model. Among nine different optimization models embedded in Jostar, we selected the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and their resulting joint ranking. The findings show that pod weight can be explained with a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.78–0.93) and low root-mean-square error (RMSE = 940–1369 kg/ha) for two years of data. Seed length yield assessment resulted in higher accuracies (R2 = 0.83–0.98) and lower errors (RMSE = 4.245–6.018 mm). Among optimization models used, ACO and SA outperformed others and the SAM vegetation detection approach showed improved results when compared to the RENDVI approach when dense canopies were being examined. Wavelengths at 450, 500, 520, 650, 700, and 760 nm, were identified in almost all data sets and harvest stage models used. The period between 44–55 days after planting (DAP) the optimal time period for yield assessment. Future work should involve transferring the learned concepts to a multispectral system, for eventual operational use; further attention should also be paid to seed length as a ground truth data collection technique, since this yield indicator is far more rapid and straightforward.

Leaf area index (LAI) is an established structural variable that reflects the 3D leaf layering of vegetation in response to environmental inputs. In this context, unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based methods present a new approach to such plant-to field-scale LAI assessment for precision agriculture applications. This study used UAS-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and multispectral imagery (MSI) as two modalities to evaluate the LAI of a snap bean field, toward eventual yield modeling and disease risk assessment. LiDAR-derived and MSIderived metrics were fed to multiple biophysical-based and regression models. The correlation between the derived LAI and field-measured LAI was significant. Six LiDAR-derived metrics were fit in eight models to predict LAI, among which the square root of the laser penetration index (√LPI) achieved the most accurate prediction result ( 𝑹 𝟐 =0.61, nRMSE=19%). The MSIderived models, which contained both structural features and spectral signatures, provided similar predicting effectiveness, with predicted 𝑹 𝟐 ≈0.5 and nRMSE≈22%. We furthermore observed variation in model effectiveness for different cultivars, different cultivar groups, and different UAS flight altitudes, for both the LiDAR and MSI approaches. For data collected at a consistent flight altitude, MSI-derived models could even exceed LiDARderived models, in terms of accuracy. This finding could support the possibility of replacing LiDAR with more cost-effective MSIbased approaches. However, LiDAR remains a viable modality, since a LiDAR-derived 3D model only required a single predictor variable, while an MSI-derived model relied on multiple independent variables in our case.

No abstract