Objective: This study aimed to identify the different associations between antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and arrhythmias, and to determine whether pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving AADs increase the risk of AAD-related arrhythmias compared to using AADs alone.Materials and methods: The disproportionality analysis of AAD-associated cardiac arrhythmias, including AAD monotherapies and concomitant use of pharmacokinetic interacting agents involving AADs, was conducted by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) as detection of potential safety signals based on FAERS data from January 2016 to June 2022. We compared the clinical features of patients reported with AAD–associated arrhythmias between fatal and non-fatal groups, and further investigated the onset time (TTO) following different AAD regimens.Results: A total of 11754 AAD–associated cardiac arrhythmias reports were identified, which was more likely to occur in the elderly (52.17%). Significant signals were detected between cardiac arrhythmia and all AAD monotherapies, with ROR ranging from 4.86 with mexiletine to 11.07 with flecainide. Regarding four specific arrhythmias in High Level Term (HLT) level, the AAD monotherapies with the highest ROR were flecainide in cardiac conduction disorders (ROR025 = 21.18), propafenone in rate and rhythm disorders (ROR025 = 10.36), dofetilide in supraventricular arrhythmias (ROR025 = 17.61), and ibutilide in ventricular arrhythmias (ROR025 = 4.91). Dofetilide/ibutilide, ibutilide, mexiletine/ibutilide and dronedarone presented no signal in the above four specific arrhythmias respectively. Compared with amiodarone monotherapy, sofosbuvir plus amiodarone detected the most significantly increased ROR in arrhythmias.Conclusion: The investigation showed the spectrum and risk of AAD–associated cardiac arrhythmias varied among different AAD therapies. The early identification and management of AAD-associated arrhythmias are of great importance in clinical practice.

No abstract

What is known and objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved clinical outcomes for a wide range of cancers but can also lead to cardiovascular toxicities. This study was to scientifically and systematically explore the association between cardiovascular toxicities and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and also to characterize the main features of ICI-related cardiovascular toxicities.Methods: From January 2012 to December 2020, data in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved for disproportionality analysis. The definition of adverse events (AEs) relied on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). We used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association between ICIs and cardiovascular AEs. Clinical characteristics of patients with ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicities were collected, and the time to onset following different ICI regimens was further investigated.Results and discussion: We identified a total of 13,713 ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicities which appeared to influence more men (56.90%) than women (36.79%), with a median age of 67 (interquartile range [IQR] 58-74) years. ICI-associated cardiovascular AEs were most frequently reported in lung, pleura, thymus and heart cancer patients (34.49%). Compared with the full database, ICI therapies were detected with pharmacovigilance of myocardial disorders (ROR: 2.64; 95% CI: 2.55-2.75) and pericardial disorders (ROR: 4.51; 95% CI: 4.30-4.74). Concerning myocardial and pericardial disorders, a significant increased ROR was found for all anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapies, with the exception of anti-CTLA-4 monotherapies.Regarding cardiac arrhythmias, only tremelimumab among ICI monotherapies was associated with an increased ROR (1.92, 4 cases). Compared with ICI monotherapy, ICI combination therapy detected an increase in cardiovascular toxicity spectrum, but did not prolong the onset time.What is new and conclusion: We observed that the spectrum and risk of ICIassociated cardiovascular AEs differed between therapeutic regimens. The poor clinical outcome and early onset of these events should attract clinical attention.