The hepatic response to glucagon was investigated in five groups of animals: (1) controls; (2) excess growth hormone (GH; tumor-bearing); (3) streptozotocin-induced diabetic; (4) cortisol-treated, and (5) insulin-treated animals. Blood samples were collected from the animal models and hepatocytes were prepared and used for glucagon-binding studies and studies of total glucose production, gluconeogenesis and glycogen determinations. Glucagon binding was elevated in GH-tumor-bearing and cortisol-treated hepatocytes but lower in hepatocytes from diabetic animals. Basal total glucose production wash higher in hepatocytes from diabetic rats but not changed in hepatocytes from GH-tumor-bearing, insulin-treated or cortisol-treated animals. Glucagon significantly stimulated total glucose production in hepatocytes from control, insulin-treated and cortisol-treated but not diabetic and GH tumor models. Gluconeogenesis as evaluated by alanine conversion to glucose was significantly increased in hepatocytes from diabetic and cortisol-treated animals and was significantly lower in hepatocytes from GH-tumor-bearing animals. Glucagon failed to significantly stimulate gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes from diabetic and tumor-bearing animals. Hepatic glycogen content was significantly decreased in diabetic and GH-tumor-bearing animals but not changed in insulin-treated and cortisol-treated animals. We conclude that increased glucagon binding was not always correlated with an increase in glucagon-stimulated glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis or increased sensitivity to glucagon Persistent hyperinsulinism may effectively suppress glucagon- or cortisol-stimulated pathways.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.