In our study population, ADR and withdrawal time decrease by roughly 7 and 20%, respectively, by the end of the day. Our results imply that rather than mental or physical fatigue, lower ADR at the end of the day might be driven by endoscopists rushing.
Background
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a validated and widely used
measure of colonoscopy quality. There is uncertainty in the published
literature on which colonoscopy examinations should be excluded when
measuring a physician’s ADR.
Objective
To examine the impact of varying the colonoscopy exclusion criteria
on physician ADR.
Design
We applied different exclusion criteria used in 30 prior studies to a
dataset of endoscopy and pathology reports. Under each exclusion criterion,
we calculated physician ADR.
Setting
A private practice colonoscopy center affiliated with the University
of Illinois College of Medicine.
Patients
Data on 20,040 colonoscopy examinations and associated pathology
notes performed by 11 gastroenterologists from July 2009 to May 2013.
Main Outcome Measurements
ADR across all colonoscopy exainations, each physician’s ADR,
and ADR ranking.
Results
There were 28 different exclusion criteria used when measuring ADR.
Each study used a different combination of these exclusion criteria. The
fraction of all colonoscopy examinations in the dataset excluded under these
combinations of exclusion criteria ranged from 0 to 93.1%. The mean
ADR across all colonoscopy examination was 35.9%. The change in mean
ADR after applying the 28 exclusion criteria ranged from −4.6 to
+3.1 percentage points. However, the exclusion criteria impacted
each physician’s ADR relatively equally, and therefore
physicians’ rankings via ADR were stable.
Limitations
ADR assessment was limited to a single private endoscopy center.
Conclusions
There is wide variation in the exclusion criteria used when
measuring ADR. Although these exclusion criteria can impact overall ADR, the
relative rankings of physicians by ADR were stable. A consensus definition
on which exclusion criteria are applied when measuring ADR is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.