Background Low uptake of family planning services by adolescent girls remains a public health concern. An estimated 120 out of every 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19 years are having unplanned pregnancies in the sub-Saharan region. Between January and June 2020, the Phalombe District of Malawi reported 3,030 adolescent pregnancies. At this stage, most Malawian schools were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The high rate of adolescent pregnancies prompted the Ministry of Health to provide emergency contraceptives to reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies among adolescents. The provision of emergency contraceptives would be effective if girls were willing and able to access these family planning services. We thus explored the views of school-going adolescent girls regarding their preferences for modern family planning methods including emergency contraceptives in Phalombe, Malawi. Methods This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study, where quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Participants included randomly sampled school-going adolescent girls from eight purposively selected secondary schools and eight randomly selected primary schools. All the schools were sampled from three purposively selected Traditional Authorities namely Nkhulambe, Jenala and Nkhumba which had reported high numbers of adolescent pregnancies. We analyzed the GeoPoints for schools and health facilities using ArcGIS, while adolescent girls’ views were analyzed using STATA. Results Participants included 388 adolescent girls, ranging in age from 10 to 19 years (median age = 15.5 years, SD = 1.9 years). Participants were hesitant to use contraceptives because they were afraid of being stigmatized and embarrassed, had to travel long distances to reach the service center, knew little about modern family planning and were afraid of medical complications. Conclusion The uptake of family planning services by adolescent girls can be improved by bringing healthcare services closer to schools and homes. Family planning services should employ health workers who are non-judgmental and who are able to remove the stigma associated with family planning. Health workers should at any given opportunity, address the misconceptions and beliefs that adolescents have towards contraceptives. Community sensitization and health talks should be done to improve adolescent girls’ understanding of family planning services.

Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the number one leading cause of death among women in Malawi. However, it is generally viewed as preventable and treatable if diagnosed in an early stage. Despite the burden, Malawi registers low uptake of cervical cancer screening (CCS). This study examined the socio-demographic determinants of CCS uptake among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi district. Methods A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in five health facilities. A total of 482 women between the ages of 18–49 participated and were sampled using a multi-stage sampling method. An interviewer administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data from June to July, 2019. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify determinants of CCS uptake among WCBA. Results Few respondents (13.1%) had ever done CCS. Compared to respondents in the age-group of 18–24 years, those in the age-groups of 25–35 years and 36–49 years were 2.63 and 3.90 times more likely to undergo CCS (AOR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.30–5.31 and AOR = 3.90, 95% CI 1.62–9.38), respectively. Respondents who practiced Christianity were 2.77 times more likely to undergo CCS than those who practiced Islam (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.23–6.22). Respondents of the Chewa ethnic group were 71% less likely to undergo CCS as compared to those of Yao ethnicity (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.95). Respondents who lived in semi-urban areas were 2.57 times more likely to go for CCS than those who were village residents (AOR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.19–5.55). Conclusion Our study showed that CCS uptake was low in Mangochi and the results suggested that age, religion, ethnicity and place of residence were determinants of CCS uptake. We recommend that comprehensive health education on CC should specifically target the young women and Muslim women in places where they meet. We call upon the district health authorities to scale up CCS provision in all Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) and outreach clinics to improve CCS uptake among women residing in the villages and those of the Chewa ethnicity. We, further, call upon all CC program implementers to design programs that address the highlighted socio-demographic determinants of CCS uptake among WCBA in the district.

Background Cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake remains low in poor countries. Few studies have assessed individual need and health system factors which facilitate/impede use of healthcare services, including CCS utilization. Thus, we examined associations between these factors and CCS utilization among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi, Malawi. Methods A cross-sectional study, sampling 482 women (18–49 years) using a multi-stage sampling method was conducted in five health facilities (HFs). Data were collected using a structured interview questionnaire from June-July, 2019. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the distribution of CCS utilization according to different independent groups. Results Our study found that 13.1% of the study participants had a history of CCS. The proportion of WCBA with a history of CCS was significantly higher among HIV + women than HIV- women and women with unknown HIV status, respectively [27.3% (33/121) vs. 8.5% (30/353) vs. 0% (0/8), χ2 = 29.18, df = 2, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who had ever heard of cervical cancer (CC) than those who had not [23.0% (60/261) vs. 1.4% (3/221), χ2 = 49.28, df = 1, p < 0.001], among those who heard of CC from HFs than those who heard through radios, friends/family and other sources, respectively [31.2% (44/141) vs. 16.7% (7/42) vs. 9.3% (5/54) vs. 16.7% (4/24), χ2 = 12.62, df = 3, p = 0.006], among those with positive beliefs towards CCS than those with negative beliefs [19.2% (53/276) vs. 4.9% (10/206), χ2 = 21.37, df = 1 p < 0.001], among those recommended for CCS by health workers (HWs) than those not recommended [19.6% (53/270) vs. 4.7% (10/212), χ2 = 23.24, df = 1, p < 0.001], among those willing to be screened by male HWs than those unwilling [14.4% (60/418) vs. 4.7% (3/64), χ2 = 4.57, df = 1, p = 0.033]. Fisher’s exact test showed that CCS uptake among WCBA varied significantly by level of knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, with 66.7% (12/18) and 19.8% (48/243) among those with high-level and low-level knowledge screened, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions HIV status, ever heard of CC, sources of information, knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, beliefs, recommendations by HWs for CCS, willingness to be screened by male HWs were associated with CCS utilization. Thus, sensitization campaigns for CCS should be conducted to increase uptake. Further, health facilities should intensify health education on CC, including signs and symptoms to increase knowledge. In addition, CC program implementers should be willing to train both males and females to offer CCS as the clients are open to be attended to by male providers as well.

Background Cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake remains low in poor countries. Limited studies have assessed individual need and health system factors which facilitate/impede use of healthcare services, including CCS uptake. Thus, we examined associations between these factors and CCS uptake among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi, Malawi. Methods A cross-sectional study, sampling 482 women (18–49 years) using a multi-stage sampling method was conducted in five health facilities (HFs). Data were collected from June-July, 2019. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the distribution of CCS uptake according to different independent groups. Results The proportion of WCBA who did CCS was significantly higher among HIV + women than those who were HIV- and with unknown HIV status, respectively [27.3% (33/121) vs 8.5% (30/353) vs 0% (0/8), χ2 = 29.18, df = 2, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who had ever heard of cervical cancer (CC) than those who had not [23.0% (60/261) vs 1.4% (3/221), χ2 = 49.28, df = 1, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who heard of CC from HFs than those who heard through radios, friends/family and other sources, respectively [31.2% (44/141) vs 16.7% (7/42) vs 9.3% (5/54) vs 16.7% (4/24), χ2 = 12.62, df = 3, p = 0.006]. Significantly higher among those with positive beliefs towards CCS than those with negative beliefs [19.2% (53/276) vs 4.9% (10/206), χ2 = 21.37, df = 1 p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those recommended for CCS by health workers (HWs) than those not recommended [19.6% (53/270) vs 4.7% (10/212), χ2 = 23.24, df = 1, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those willing to be screened by male HWs than those unwilling [14.4% (60/418) vs 4.7% (3/64), χ2 = 4.57, df = 1, p = 0.033]. Fisher’s exact test showed that CCS uptake among WCBA varied significantly by level of knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, with 66.7% (12/18) and 19.8% (48/243) among those with high-level and low-level knowledge screened, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions HIV status, ever heard of CC, sources of information, knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, beliefs, recommendations by HWs for CCS, willingness to be screened by male HWs were associated with CCS uptake. These should be prioritized to improve CCS uptake among WCBA.