The peripheral terminals of primary sensory neurons detect histamine and non-histamine itch-provoking ligands through molecularly distinct transduction mechanisms. It remains unclear, however, whether these distinct pruritogens activate the same or different afferent fibers. We utilized a strategy of reversibly silencing specific subsets of murine pruritogen-sensitive sensory axons by targeted delivery of a charged sodium-channel blocker and found that functional blockade of histamine itch did not affect the itch evoked by chloroquine or SLIGRL-NH2, and vice versa. Notably, blocking itch-generating fibers did not reduce pain-associated behavior. However, silencing TRPV1+ or TRPA1+ neurons allowed AITC or capsaicin respectively to evoke itch, implying that certain peripheral afferents may normally indirectly inhibit algogens from eliciting itch. These findings support the presence of functionally distinct sets of itch-generating neurons and suggest that targeted silencing of activated sensory fibers may represent a clinically useful anti-pruritic therapeutic approach for histaminergic and non-histaminergic pruritus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEWe have developed a strategy to target the permanently charged lidocaine derivative lidocaine N-ethyl bromide (QX-314) selectively into nociceptive sensory neurons through the large-pore transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V (TRPV1) noxious heat detector channel. This involves co-administration of QX-314 and a TRPV1 agonist to produce a long-lasting local analgesia. For potential clinical use we propose using lidocaine as the TRPV1 agonist, because it activates TRPV1 at clinical doses. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHWe conducted experiments in rats to determine optimal concentrations and ratios of lidocaine and QX-314 that produce the greatest degree and duration of pain-selective block when administered nearby the sciatic nerve: reduction in the response to noxious mechanical (pinch) and to radiant heat stimuli, with minimal disruption in motor function (grip strength). KEY RESULTSA combination of 0.5% QX-314 and 2% lidocaine produced 1 h of non-selective sensory and motor block followed by >9 h of pain-selective block, where grip strength was unimpaired. QX-314 at this concentration had no effect by itself, while 2% lidocaine by itself produced 1 h of non-selective block. The combination of 0.5% QX-314 and 2% lidocaine was the best of the many tested, in terms of the duration and selectivity of local analgesia. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSTargeting charged sodium channel blockers into specific sets of axons via activation of differentially expressed large-pore channels provides an opportunity to produce prolonged local analgesia, and represents an example of how exploiting ion channels as a drug delivery port can be used to increase the specificity and efficacy of therapeutics.

No abstract