Fitting apparel and apparel in performing different activities is essential for the functional yet comfortable experience of the user. 4D scans, i.e. 3D scans in continuous timestamps, of the body (part) in performing those activities are the basis for the design of garments/apparel in 4D. In this paper, we proposed a semi-automatic workflow for constructing 4D scans of the body parts with the emphasis on registering noisy scans at a given timestamp. Continuous 3D scans regarding the moving body parts are captured first from different depth cameras from different view angles. In a given timestamp, the collected 3D scans are roughly aligned to a template using the rigid Iterative Closest Points (ICP) algorithm. Then these scans are further registered using a newly proposed non-rigid Iterative Closest-Farthest Points (ICFP) algorithm, in which correspondences between the source and the target are established by either closest or farthest points based on the newly defined logical distance concept and the probability theory. Experimental results indicated that the ICFP method is robust against noise and the scanning accuracy can be as high as 3.4 %. It also reveals that, for the human foot, the differences of ball width and ball angles between the loaded and the unloaded situation can be as large as 8 mm and 2 degrees, respectively. This highlights the importance of using 4D scan in designing garments and apparel.

Optical motion capturing explains the three-Dimensional (3D) position estimation of points through triangulation employing several depth cameras. Prosperous performance relies on level of visibility of points from different cameras and the overlap of captured meshes in-between. Generally, the accuracy of the estimation is practically based on the camera parameters e.g., location and orientations. Accordingly, the camera network configurations play a key role in the quality of the estimated mesh. This paper proposes an optimal approach for camera placement based on characteristics of a depth camera D435i - Intel RealSense. The optimal problem includes a cost function that contains several minimisation and maximisation terms. The minimisation terms are distance of the cameras to the center of the scanning object, resolution error, and sparsity. And the maximisation terms are distance between each two pair of cameras, percent of captured point from an object, and the level of overlap between cameras. The object is designed based on practical experiments of human walking and is a bounding box around one step of dynamic foot work-space from heel strike posture to toe-off posture. The accuracy and robustness of the algorithms are assessed via experiment measurement, and sensitivity to the number of cameras is investigated. Accordingly, the experiment results determined that the scanning accuracy can be as high as 2.5 % based on a reference scan with a high-end scanner (Artec Eva).

Personalized designs bring added value to the products and the users. Meanwhile, they also pose challenges to the product design process as each product differs. In this paper, with the focus on personalized fit, we present an overview as well as details of the personalized design process based on design practice. The general workflow of personalized product design is introduced first. Then different steps in the workflow such as human data/parameters acquisition, computational design, design for digital fabrication, and product evaluation are presented. Tools and methods that are often used in different steps in the process are also outlined where in human data acquisition, 3D scanning, and digital human models are addressed. For computational design, the use of computational thinking tools such as abstraction, decomposition, pattern recognition and algorithms are discussed. In design for digital fabrication, additive manufacturing methods (e.g. FDM), and their requirements on the design are highlighted. For product evaluation, both functional evaluation and usability evaluation are considered and the evaluation results can be the starting point of the next design iteration. Finally, several case studies are presented for a better understanding of the workflow, the importance of different steps in the workflow and the deviations in the approach regarding different contexts. In conclusion, we intend to provide designers a holistic view of the design process in designing personalized products as well as help practitioners trigger innovations regarding each step of the process.