Objective The objective of this study was to determine if supportive care without endotracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) was safe in the absence of complications in gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)/gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) intoxicated patients with a decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a Dutch tertiary urban ED with a reduced level of consciousness related to alleged GHB/GBL intoxication between April 2011–December 2014. Primary endpoint was major adverse events, defined by: upper airway obstruction not resolved with mayo tube or nasopharyngeal airway, hypoxia not resolved with 15 l of oxygen delivered via non-rebreathing mask, bradypnea not resolved after stimulation, intubation, bradycardia not resolved after intravenous atropine bolus, hypotension for which inotropes were started. Results Data of 209 patients were retrieved. Major adverse events were reported in five patients (2.4%; 95% CI: 0.8–5.5). Intubation with subsequent ICU admission was required for 1.4% of patients (95% CI: 0.3–4.1). The most frequently seen minor adverse events (N = 209) were: airway obstruction (22%), hypothermia (14.8%), hypoxia (12.9%), bradycardia (8.1%), hypotension (6.7%), bradypnea (5.7%), vomiting (5.3%). There were no deaths. None of the patients had signs of aspiration pneumonia or returned to our ED due to complications. Conclusion Our study suggests that conservative airway management for patients with a decreased GCS due to suspected GHB intoxication may be safe. Major adverse events were present in 2.4% of patients, only 1.4% of patients required intubation. All minor adverse events were managed effectively with conservative treatment.

BackgroundAcute lateral ankle ligament injuries are very common problems in present health care. Still there is no hard evidence about which treatment strategy is superior. Current evidence supports the view that a functional treatment strategy is preferable, but insufficient data are present to prove the benefit of external support devices in these types of treatment. The hypothesis of our study is that external ankle support devices will not result in better outcome in the treatment of acute ankle sprains, compared to a purely functional treatment strategy. Overall objective is to compare the results of three different strategies of functional treatment for acute ankle sprain, especially to determine the advantages of external support devices in addition to functional treatment strategy, based on balance and coordination exercises.Methods/designThis study is designed as a randomised controlled multi-centre trial with one-year follow-up. Adult and healthy patients (N = 180) with acute, single sided and first inversion trauma of the lateral ankle ligaments will be included. They will all follow the same schedule of balancing exercises and will be divided into 3 treatment groups, 1. pressure bandage and tape, 2. pressure bandage and brace and 3. no external support. Primary outcome measure is the Karlsson scoring scale; secondary outcomes are FAOS (subscales), number of recurrent ankle injuries, Visual Analogue Scales of pain and satisfaction and adverse events. They will be measured after one week, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.DiscussionThe ANKLE TRIAL is a randomized controlled trial in which a purely functional treated control group, without any external support is investigated. Results of this study could lead to other opinions about usefulness of external support devices in the treatment of acute ankle sprain.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2151

ObjectivesGamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a drug of abuse with central depressing effects, which may cause coma with a GCS score as low as 3. A rapid diagnosis ‘GHB intoxication’ may prevent unnecessary diagnostic work-up and may lead to guided, less invasive, treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ED physicians’ clinical evaluation were sufficient for diagnosis in patients with suspected GHB-intoxication.MethodsPatients presenting at the ED with a GCS<15 and a potential intoxication with drugs of abuse for whom urine toxicology screen was performed were included consecutively. After a first assessment, the ED physician registered the most likely initial diagnosis in the hospital information system. Urine of these patients was tested with a validated gas chromatography analytical method for GHB (confirmation test). The initial diagnoses were compared for agreement with the results of the confirmation test.ResultsA total of 506 patients were included, 100 patients tested positive for GHB and 406 patients tested negative for GHB. Sensitivity and specificity of the ED physicians compared with the confirmation test to diagnose GHB intoxications were 63% (95% CI 52 to 73) and 93% (95% CI 90 to 95), respectively. The positive predictive value was 67% (95% CI 60 to 77) and the negative predictive value was 92% (95% CI 88 to 94).ConclusionPhysicians underestimate the presence of GHB intoxication and can fail to diagnose GHB intoxication based on clinical observations alone. In the future, a rapid reliable initial analytical GHB test in addition to clinical judgement could be valuable to reduce false negative diagnosis.

No abstract

Introduction: Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) have been increasingly reported in the last 15-20 years. We aimed to describe presentations to the emergency department (ED) with acute recreational drug toxicity involving NPS. Methods: Data were extracted from the European Drug Emergencies Network (Euro-DEN) Plus database for all presentations to ED (36 EDs in 24 European countries) with acute toxicity between January 2014 and December 2019. Patient demographics, agents involved, and clinical outcomes were described and the subgroup of presentations involving NPS was compared with the rest of the cohort. Results: Out of 43,633 Euro-DEN Plus presentations, 3304 (7.6%) involved at least one NPS. Agents were identified mainly based on self-report or clinical presentation, with analytical confirmation being performed only in 17.9% of NPS presentations. The proportion of NPS presentations varied by centre (0-48.8%). For centres where data were available for all 6 years, NPS-related presentations peaked in 2015 (11.9%). In 2014, 78.4% of NPS agents reported were cathinones, while only 3.4% were synthetic cannabinoids (SCs); conversely, in 2019 only 11.6% of NPS agents reported were cathinones, while 72.2% were SCs. NPS-related presentations involved younger patients (median 30 (23-37) vs. 32 (25-40) years, p < 0.001) and more males (84.8 vs. 75.8%, p < 0.001) compared with the rest of the cohort. Patients presenting to ED after using NPS were more likely to self-discharge (22.8 vs. 15.1%), less likely to be admitted to critical care (3.6 vs. 6.1%) but had a longer length of stay in hospital (median 5.1 (2.7-18.7) vs. 4.7 (2.5-9.2) h, p < 0.001). Death occurred in 0.5% of all presentations involving NPS and in 0.4% of non-NPS presentations. Conclusions: This large multicentre series of NPS presentations to European EDs showed marked geographical variation and changes over time in the proportion of presentations to ED involving NPS, as well as the proportion of NPS subgroups.