It is well known that hyperglycemia leads to the progression and expansion of various micro and macrovascular disease such as diabetic nephropathy (DN).Lycoperoside H (LH) alkaloidal saponin exhibited the antidiabetic effect, but its DN effect is unclear. In this experimental study, we scrutinized the renal protective effect of LH against the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DN in rats and explore the underlying mechanism. Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this experimental study and an intraperitoneal injection of STZ (45 mg/kg) was used for the induction of diabetes, rats received the oral administration of LH (20 mg/kg). The blood glucose level, body weight, organ weight (renal and pancreas), and biochemical parameters were estimated. We also scrutinized the effect of LH to enhance intestinal barrier function and suppress inflammation and intestinal permeability. LH significantly (p < 0.001) decreased the glucose level and enhanced the body weight with a reduction of renal weight and boost the pancreas weight. LH significantly (p < 0.001) enhanced the creatinine level and decreased the albumin level, urine volume, urinary albumin excretion rate, and urinary albumin creatinine ratio in the urine. It also suppressed the renal parameters, such as creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and urea. LH significantly (p < 0.001) altered the level of lipid and antioxidant parameters. LH treatment significantly (p < 0.001) suppressed the cytokines and inflammatory parameters. LH considerably enhanced the Ruminococcaceae, Blautia, and suppressed the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Turicibacter. It reduced the F/B ratio along with alteration of community abundance of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, other bacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The current result suggests that LH suppressed the diabetic nephropathological condition via alteration of gut microbiota and inflammation.

Objective. To investigate the effect of metformin on renal function, cardiac function, and inflammatory response in diabetic nephropathy and its protective mechanism. Methods. A total of 88 patients with diabetic nephropathy who were admitted to our hospital from April 2019 to October 2020 were recruited and grouped according to different treatment methods, namely, the experimental group ( n = 44 ) and the control group ( n = 44 ). The patients in the experimental group were treated with metformin, and the patients in the control group were treated with liraglutide injection (nonmetformin). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and inflammatory response (hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6) were compared. Results. Compared with corresponding values before treatment, BUN, Scr, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, LVEDD, and LVESD were decreased after treatment, whereas LVEF was increased (all P < 0.05 ), with significant change in the experimental group (all P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Metformin can effectively improve the level of renal function and cardiac function in patients with diabetic nephropathy and help patients control and reduce the body’s inflammatory response, and its therapeutic efficacy is superior to that of liraglutide injection.

Objective. To study and analyze the clinical efficacy of axitinib combined with tislelizumab in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and its effects on renal function and serum cytokines. Methods. Totally 49 patients with advanced renal cancer treated in our hospital from November 2018 to January 2020 were randomized to treatment with axitinib (control group, n = 27) or axitinib combined with tislelizumab (study group, n = 22). The clinical efficacy, renal function and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results. After treatment, both groups showed a significant decrease in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (SCR), but treatment with axitinib plus tislelizumab led to a significantly greater reduction than did the axitinib (each p < 0.05 ). After treatment, both groups showed a significant decrease in TNF-β1, VEGF, TIMP-1, and MMP-2, but treatment with axitinib plus tislelizumab led to a significantly greater reduction than did the axitinib (each p < 0.05 ). The study group had significantly higher rates of adverse reactions ( p < 0.05 ). Significant difference was observed in ORR (59.1% vs 40.7%) and DCR (81.8% vs 66.7%) between the study group and the control group, with higher results in study group ( p < 0.05 ). The study group was superior to the control group in OS ( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Our study presents an effective alternative for advanced renal cell carcinoma by using axitinib plus tislelizumab. Limitations merit attention, and the study group had higher rates of adverse reactions. Therefore, further studies are suggested to secure a larger population of subjects.