Botulinum toxin (BT) has been perceived as a lethal threat for many centuries. In the early 1980s, this perception completely changed when BT’s therapeutic potential suddenly became apparent. We wish to give an overview over BT’s mechanisms of action relevant for understanding its therapeutic use. BT’s molecular mode of action includes extracellular binding to glycoprotein structures on cholinergic nerve terminals and intracellular blockade of the acetylcholine secretion. BT affects the spinal stretch reflex by blockade of intrafusal muscle fibres with consecutive reduction of Ia/II afferent signals and muscle tone without affecting muscle strength (reflex inhibition). This mechanism allows for antidystonic effects not only caused by target muscle paresis. BT also blocks efferent autonomic fibres to smooth muscles and to exocrine glands. Direct central nervous system effects are not observed, since BT does not cross the blood-brain barrier and since it is inactivated during its retrograde axonal transport. Indirect central nervous system effects include reflex inhibition, normalisation of reciprocal inhibition, intracortical inhibition and somatosensory evoked potentials. Reduction of formalin-induced pain suggests direct analgesic BT effects possibly mediated by blockade of substance P, glutamate and calcitonin gene-related peptide.

-This review describes therapeutically relevant mechanisms of action of botulinum toxin (BT). B T 's molecular mode of action includes extracellular binding to glycoproteine structures on cholinergic nerve terminals and intracellular blockade of the acetylcholine secretion. BT affects the spinal stretch reflex by blockade of intrafusal muscle fibres with consecutive reduction of Ia/II afferent signals and muscle tone without affecting muscle strength (reflex inhibition). This mechanism allows for antidystonic effects not only caused by target muscle paresis. BT also blocks efferent autonomic fibres to smooth muscles and to exocrine glands. Direct central nervous system effects are not observed, since BT does not cross the bloodbrain-barrier and since it is inactivated during its retrograde axonal transport. Indirect central nervous system effects include reflex inhibition, normalisation of reciprocal inhibition, intracortical inhibition and somatosensory evoked potentials. Reduction of formalin-induced pain suggests direct analgesic BT effects possibly mediated through blockade of substance P, glutamate and calcitonin gene related peptide.KEY WORDS: botulinum toxin, mechanisms of action, acetylcholine, muscle spindles, stretch reflex, smooth muscles, exocrine glands, retrograde axonal transport, blood-brain-barrier, substance P.Toxina botulínica: mecanismos de ação RESUMO -O propósito deste artigo é uma revisão dos mecanismos de ação da toxina botulínica (TB) relevantes para a compreensão do seu uso terapêutico. A ação da TB a nível molecular consiste na sua ligação extracelular a estruturas glicoprotéicas em terminais nervosos colinérgicos e no bloqueio intracelular da secreção de acetilcolina. A TB interfere no reflexo espinal de estiramento através do bloqueio de fibras musculares intrafusais causando redução da sinalização aferente veiculada por fibras Ia e II e do tono muscular. Portanto, o efeito da TB pode estar relacionado não somente à paresia muscular mas também à inibição reflexa espinal. A TB promove ainda o bloqueio de fibras autonômicas para músculos lisos e glândulas exócrinas. Apesar de ocorrer alguma difusão sistêmica após a aplicação intramuscular a TB não atinge o sistema nervoso central (SNC) devido ao seu peso molecular (não atravessa a barreira hematoencefálica) e à lentidão do seu transporte axonal retrógrado que permite a sua inativação. Os efeitos indiretos sobre o SNC são: inibição reflexa, reversão das alterações da inibição recíproca, da inibição intracortical e de potenciais evocados somatosensoriais. A redução da dor induzida por formalina sugere que a TB tenha efeito analgésico direto possivelmente mediado por bloqueio da substância P, do glutamato e do peptídeo relacionado ao gene da calcitonina.PA L AV R A S -C H AVE: toxina botulínica, mecanismos de ação, acetilcolina, fusos musculares; reflexo de estiramento, músculos lisos, glândulas exócrinas, transporte axonal retrógrado, barreira hematoencefálica, substância P.

Recently, botulinum toxin type B (BT-B) became commercially available for treatment of cervical dystonia. It is the aim of this study to explore its use for treatment of bilateral axillar hyperhydrosis (HH). For this we directly compared the antihyperhydrotic effect of BT-B (NeuroBloc)/MyoBloc) with that of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) (Botox). 9 patients (HD group) received BT-A 100MU unilaterally and BT-B 4000MU contralaterally. 10 patients (LD group) received BT-A 100MU and BT-B 2000MU. All patients were blinded as to which preparation was used in which side. All patients except one reported excellent HH improvement in both axillae. None of the patients had residual HH on clinical examination. The duration of HH improvement until first recurrence in the HD group was 16.0 +/-4.3 weeks in the BT-A treated axillar and 16.4 +/-4.5 weeks in the BT-B treated axillae (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.336). In the LD group it was 16.4 +/-5.3 weeks in the BT-B treated axillae and 17.1 +/-5.7 weeks in the BT-A treated axillae (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.059). There was also no difference in the duration of HH improvement between the axillae treated with BT-B 4000MU and BT-B 2000MU (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.712). 5 out of 9 patients in the HD group (chi-square test, p = 0.025) and 7 out of 10 patients in the LD group (chi-square test, p = 0.008) reported more application discomfort in the BT-B treated axillae. In 6 out of 9 patients in the HD group (chi-square test, p = 0.014) and in 6 out of 10 patients in the LD group (chi-square test, p = 0.014) the onset of HH improvement appeared earlier in the BT-B treated axillae. One patient in the HD group reported dryness of the mouth and eyes and accomodation difficulties.BT-B is a safe and efficient treatment for axillar HH. Doses of BT-B 2000MU per axilla seem sufficient indicating a conversion factor between BT-A and BT-B in the order of 1:20. With a conversion factor for cervical dystonia in the order of 1:40 the autonomic nervous system seems to be relatively more sensitive to BT-B than to BT-A compared with the motor system.

Spasticity is a symptom occurring in many neurological conditions including stroke, multiple sclerosis, hypoxic brain damage, traumatic brain injury, tumours and heredodegenerative diseases. It affects large numbers of patients and may cause major disability. So far, spasticity has merely been described as part of the upper motor neurone syndrome or defined in a narrowed neurophysiological sense. This consensus organised by IAB-Interdisciplinary Working Group Movement Disorders wants to provide a brief and practical new definition of spasticity-for the first time-based on its various forms of muscle hyperactivity as described in the current movement disorders terminology. We propose the following new definition system: Spasticity describes involuntary muscle hyperactivity in the presence of central paresis. The involuntary muscle hyperactivity can consist of various forms of muscle hyperactivity: spasticity sensu strictu describes involuntary muscle hyperactivity triggered by rapid passive joint movements, rigidity involuntary muscle hyperactivity triggered by slow passive joint movements, dystonia spontaneous involuntary muscle hyperactivity and spasms complex involuntary movements usually triggered by sensory or acoustic stimuli. Spasticity can be described by a documentation system grouped along clinical picture (axis 1), aetiology (axis 2), localisation (axis 3) and additional central nervous system deficits (axis 4). Our new definition allows distinction of spasticity components accessible to BT therapy and those inaccessible. The documentation sheet presented provides essential information for planning of BT therapy.

Botulinum toxin (BT) used for dystonia and spasticity is dosed according to the number of target muscles and the severity of their muscle hyperactivities. With this no other drug is used in a broader dose range than BT. The upper end of this range, however, still needs to be explored. We wanted to do this by a prospective non-interventional study comparing a randomly selected group of dystonia and spasticity patients receiving incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®)) high-dose therapy (HD group, n = 100, single dose ≥400 MU) to a control group receiving incobotulinumtoxinA regular-dose therapy (RD group, n = 30, single dose ≤200 MU). At the measurement point all patients were evaluated for systemic BT toxicity, i.e. systemic motor impairment or systemic autonomic dysfunction. HD group patients (56.1 ± 13.8 years, 46 dystonia, 54 spasticity) were treated with Xeomin(®) 570.1 ± 158.9 (min 400, max 1,200) MU during 10.2 ± 7.0 (min 4, max 37) injection series. In dystonia patients the number of target muscles was 46 and the dose per target muscle 56.4 ± 19.1 MU, in spasticity patients 35 and 114.9 ± 67.1 MU. HD and RD group patients reported 58 occurrences of items on the systemic toxicity questionnaire. Generalised weakness, being bedridden, feeling of residual urine and constipation were caused by the underlying tetra- or paraparesis, blurred vision by presbyopia. Dysphagia and dryness of eye were local BT adverse effects. Neurologic examination, serum chemistry and full blood count did not indicate any systemic adverse effects. Elevated serum levels for creatine kinase/MB, creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase were most likely iatrogenic artefacts. None of the patients developed antibody-induced therapy failure. Xeomin(®) can be used safely in doses ≥400 MU and up to 1,200 MU without detectable systemic toxicity. This allows expanding the use of BT therapy to patients with more widespread and more severe muscle hyperactivity conditions. Further studies-carefully designed and rigorously monitored-are necessary to explore the threshold dose for clinically detectable systemic toxicity.