AMEs genes are disseminated in different clones of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates in Iran. Other than AMEs, there are more complex and multifactorial mechanisms that result in aminoglycoside-resistant phenotypes.
Enzymatic alteration of aminoglycosides by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) is the major mechanism of resistance to aminoglycosides. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of AME genes, staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) types, and molecular analysis of the coagulase (coa) gene in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical specimens. Totally, 102 S. aureus were tested by disk diffusion and microbroth dilution methods for susceptibility to aminoglycosides. AMEs genes and SCCmec types were determined by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For polymorphism analysis, the 3' end region of the coa gene was amplified by PCR and the products were then subjected to restriction digestion with HaeIII enzyme. Of the 102 S. aureus, 42 (41.2%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Thirty-five (83%) of MRSA strains were resistant to kanamycin, 32 (76.2%) to tobramycin, 30 (71.4%) to gentamicin, 25 (59.5%) to amikacin, and 10 (23.8%) to netilmicin. The aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″) was the most frequent gene among MRSA isolates 19 (45.2%), followed by aph(3')-IIIa 8 (19%), ant(4')-Ia 6 (14.3%), and aph(2″)-Id 2 (4.8%). SCCmec types included type I 10 (23.8%), II 1 (2.4%), III 21 (50%), and IV 7 (16.7%). Three (7.2%) isolates were nontypeable. Digestion of the PCR products of the coa gene yielded 19 distinct restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns. In conclusion, given the alarming rate of resistance to aminoglycosides among MRSA, the monitoring of aminoglycoside resistance and AME genes should be performed to limit the spread of aminoglycoside resistance among MRSA isolates. Several variants of the coa gene were found in the studied isolates, although the majority of the MRSA isolates belonged to a limited number of coagulase types.
BackgroundEnterococcus faecalis is an opportunistic pathogen that causes most of the enterococcal infections. Among the different factors implicated in the pathogenesis of these organisms, biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are the most important. The ability for biofilm formation has been attributed to the presence of some virulence genes. However, no definite correlation has been found. This study aimed to detect biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance patterns in E. faecalis isolates collected from clinical and fecal samples, and to investigate possible correlation between some virulence genes (esp, cyl, gelE) and biofilm formation.Materials and MethodsA collection of 123 E. faecalis isolates were investigated for antibiotic resistance and production of hemolysin, gelatinase, and biofilm using phenotypic methods. The esp, gelE and cyl genes were detected using polymerase chain reaction.ResultsThirty-eight pathogenic isolates (37%) were positive for biofilm formation. Additionally, the gelE, esp, and cyl genes were detected in 74 (71.8%), 79 (76.7%) and 42 (40.8%) isolates, respectively. In the fecal samples, 18 (90%) isolates were biofilm producers and 11 (55%), 17 (85%) and 8 (40%) isolates were positive for gelE, esp, and cyl, respectively. There were significant differences in biofilm production between pathogenic and fecal isolates (P <0.001). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was found among 32% (n = 33) and 15% (n = 3) of the clinical and fecal isolates, respectively. However, no significant difference was seen between MDR and biofilm formation. Five pathogenic and two fecal isolates were negative for all investigated genes while they were they were biofilm producers. In contrast, 22 pathogenic isolates and 1 fecal isolate were positive for the tested genes, but did not form any biofilm. No significant differences were observed between biofilm formation and the presence of the esp, gelE and cyl genes in the pathogenic and fecal isolates (P ˃0.05).ConclusionThe presence of the esp, gelE and cyl genes might not be determining factors for biofilm formation in enterococci and other mechanisms might be involved in this process.
Background
The
Escherichia coli
sequence type 131 (ST131) is a well established clone causing significant extraintestinal infections worldwide. However, no studies have been reported the phenotypic and molecular traits of ST131 isolates in comparison to other clones of
E. coli
from Iran. So, we determined the differences between 69 ST131 strains collected during a one year surveillance study and 84 non-ST131 isolates, including 56 clinical fluoroquinolone resistant and 28 broiler colibacillosis isolates in terms of clonality and genetic background.
Results
ST131 isolates were associated with phylogroup B2 (68 out of 69 isolates, 98.4%), while clinical non-ST131 and fluoroquinolone resistant broiler isolates mainly belonged to phylogroup A. The highest virulence score was observed in ST131 clone, while they showed less diversity in virulence profiles than other clinical isolates. Almost all of the ST131 isolates (95.6%) were ExPEC and had the highest virulence scores, but their resistance scores were less than clinical non-ST131 isolates. Broiler isolates showed higher prevalence of ExPEC-associated virulence genes and CTX-M-G1/G9 resistance determinants as compared to clinical non-ST131 isolates. While
bla
OXA-48/NDM
carbapenemases were mostly found in ST131 clone, resistance rate against ertapenem was higher among clinical non-ST131 strains. According to ERIC-based fingerprinting, the ST131 strains were more genetically similar, followed by non-ST131 and broiler isolates.
Conclusions
ST131 isolates possess the ability to make a balance between clonality and extent of resistance/virulence genes content, so this phenomenon gives a fitness advantage over other
E. coli
clones. The broilers
E. coli
population poses a potential zoonotic risk which could be transmitted to the community through the food chain. A number of factors are involved in the dissemination of and infections due to ST131 clone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.