No abstract

Language impairments are a well established finding in patients with schizophrenia and in individuals at-risk for psychosis. A growing body of research has revealed shared risk factors between individuals with psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) from the general population and patients with schizophrenia. In particular, adolescents with PLEs have been shown to be at an increased risk for later psychosis. However, to date there has been little information published on electrophysiological correlates of language comprehension in this at-risk group. A 64 channel EEG recorded electrical activity while 37 (16 At-Risk; 21 Controls) participants completed the British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS-II) receptive vocabulary task. The P300 component was examined as a function of language comprehension. The at-risk group were impaired behaviourally on receptive language and were characterised by a reduction in P300 amplitude relative to the control group. The results of this study reveal electrophysiological evidence for receptive language deficits in adolescents with PLEs, suggesting that the earliest neurobiological changes underlying psychosis may be apparent in the adolescent period.

BackgroundDeficits in working memory are widely reported in schizophrenia and are considered a trait marker for the disorder. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and imaging data suggest that these differences in working memory performance may be due to aberrant functioning in the prefrontal and parietal cortices. Research suggests that many of the same risk factors for schizophrenia are shared with individuals from the general population who report psychotic symptoms.MethodsForty-two participants (age range 11–13 years) were divided into those who reported psychotic symptoms (N = 17) and those who reported no psychotic symptoms, i.e. the control group (N = 25). Behavioural differences in accuracy and reaction time were explored between the groups as well as electrophysiological correlates of working memory using a Spatial Working Memory Task, which was a variant of the Sternberg paradigm. Specifically, differences in the P300 component were explored across load level (low load and high load), location (positive probe i.e. in the same location as shown in the study stimulus and negative probe i.e. in a different location to the study stimulus) and between groups for the overall P300 timeframe. The effect of load was also explored at early and late timeframes of the P300 component (250-430 ms and 430-750 ms respectively).ResultsNo between-group differences in the behavioural data were observed. Reduced amplitude of the P300 component was observed in the psychotic symptoms group relative to the control group at posterior electrode sites. Amplitude of the P300 component was reduced at high load for the late P300 timeframe at electrode sites Pz and POz.ConclusionsThese results identify neural correlates of neurocognitive dysfunction associated with population level psychotic symptoms and provide insights into ERP abnormalities associated with the extended psychosis phenotype.

The co-presence of nasal polyps and resistant otitis media with effusion should raise the possibility of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Introduction Preoperative testing for COVID‐19 has become widely established to avoid inadvertent surgery on patients with COVID‐19 and prevent hospital outbreaks. Methods A prospective cross sectional study was carried out in two university hospitals examining the pre‐operative protocols for patients undergoing otolaryngology surgery and the incidence of COVID‐19 within 30 days of surgery in patients and the otolaryngologists performing surgery. Results One hundred and seventy‐three patients were recruited. One hundred and twenty‐three (71%) patients “cocooned” for 14 days prior to surgery. All completed a questionnaire prior to admission. One hundred and fifty‐six patients (90%) had reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs, 14 patients (8%) had CT thorax. No cases of COVID‐19 were detected among patients followed up at 30 days. Two surgeons developed COVID‐19 early during the study period. Conclusion Current pre‐operative testing protocols consisting primarily of questionnaires and RT‐PCR resulted in zero cases of COVID in this cohort. It is possible that COVID‐19 restrictions and high proportion of patients cocooning preoperatively were factors in ensuring a low rate of COVID‐19 post‐operatively.