Burn injuries commonly result in serious sequelae (such as skin contractures) in surviving patients, for which no single optimal solution is known. The goal of this study was to compare the late contraction of autologous skin grafts with or without dermal matrices used in the treatment of patients with burn contractures. This parallel design prospective, randomised and controlled clinical trial included patients with burn contracture treated using autologous skin grafts and dermal matrix. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups: Integra® matrix (n = 10), Pelnac® matrix (n = 10), Matriderm® matrix (n = 9) or a Control Group (n = 10, without dermal matrix, only skin graft). The boundaries of skin defect were marked and transferred to a flat sterile surface for area measurement. The current area of the skin grafts was measured during surgery and compared with those obtained at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve months after surgery, the Control Group presented lower rates of skin graft contraction than Integra® (p < 0.01), Matriderm® (p = 0.01) and Pelnac® (p < 0.01) groups. Pelnac® resulted in larger skin graft contraction than Matriderm® (p < 0.01) and Integra® (p = 0.02), while differences between Integra® and Matriderm® were not significant (p = 0.16). The comparison between intraoperative and 12 months after surgery showed that the worst mean rates of skin graft contraction were from the Pelnac® (51.79%) and Matriderm® (59.17%). In patients with burn contractures, the use of these three dermal matrices did not reduce or avoid the occurrence of late contraction of the skin graft, so their use for this purpose should be carefully evaluated.

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and biomechanical features of scars resulting from the treatment of burn contractures using different acellular dermal matrices (ADM). Summary Background Data: Extensive burns often lead to severe sequelae, such as skin contractures, that can be treated using ADM to improve the quality of these scars. Methods: A prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial was performed including patients with burn contractures at least 1-year postburn, treated using split-thickness skin graft (STSG). These patients were randomized into 4 groups: control (received only STSG without ADM), Integra (ADM + STSG), Matriderm (ADM + STSG), and Pelnac (ADM + STSG). Exclusion criteria were loss of follow-up and graft integration failure. The evaluation was performed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the durom-eter, and the cutometer in areas of normal skin, hypertrophic scar, and surgical scar, at least 1 year after the surgery. Results: In the VSS, durometer, and cutometer evaluation, there was no difference in the comparison of surgical scars among groups. Analyzing each group, with an intraindividual evaluation comparing areas of normal skin with surgical scars, the results suggested a possibility of a surgical scar hardness closer to normal skin for Integra and Matriderm groups measured with the durometer. In the cutometer evaluation, surgical scars were not comparable to areas of normal skin. Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no difference in the quality of scar assessed through the analysis of clinical and biomechanical features comparing acellular dermal matrices (Integra, Matriderm, and Pelnac) and only split-thickness skin graft without a dermal matrix.

Some groups have avoided early microsurgical flaps in electrical burns under the pretext of injury to the microvasculature, which could increase vascular thrombosis. However, this option frequently results in amputation of the extremity. This study aims to evaluate the early application of microsurgical flaps for the treatment of electrical burns of extremities. A case series was retrospectively evaluated including patients with electrical trauma in extremities undergoing early microsurgical reconstruction. Data were obtained from medical charts, including age, trauma location, flap type and microvascular anastomosis, the need for other procedures, postoperative complications, the length of hospital stay after the flap surgery, and patient outcomes. Five microsurgical flaps were performed in less than 30 days to trauma, one anterolateral thigh flap to cover skin failure in upper limb, and four radial forearm flaps to cover failure in feet. The patient ages had a mean of 25.8 years (from 12 to 42 years). The microsurgical procedure occurred from 21 to 27 days after the burn, with a mean of 24.2 days. Hospital discharge had a mean of 26.6 days (from 19 to 35 days after the surgery). Only one patient required reintervention for re-anastomosis. All patients had a good flap viability, avoiding amputation of the affected extremity and with a proper preservation of function. The early application of microsurgical flaps for patients with electrical burns of extremities may provide adequate, sturdy, and stable skin coverage, contributing to the treatment of noble structures exposed and avoiding amputation of the extremities.

No abstract

No abstract