Background
Malnutrition is prevalent in trauma victims because of intense muscle wasting triggered by traumatic events and is a mortality risk. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics–American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AND‐ASPEN) tool has the potential to diagnose malnutrition in this population. This study aims to evaluate this criterion as a malnutrition diagnostic tool and as a hospital mortality predictor in critically ill trauma patients.
Methods
We performed an observational prospective cohort study from April 2015 to February 2017 in a Brazilian hospital. Patients were >18 years old, remained in the intensive care unit (ICU) >48 hours, and had completed data regarding the recommended clinical characteristics (RCCs) for malnutrition. The main exposure of interest was malnutrition assessed by a specialist dietitian using AND‐ASPEN. The primary outcome was all causes of mortality during hospital stay. Secondary outcome was the RCCs assessment, to predict malnutrition and hospital mortality.
Results
Included were 414 trauma patients. Malnutrition prevalence was 26.8% at ICU admission. The main analysis showed that malnutrition increases mortality chances 1.96 times (95% CI, 1.13–3.30; P = .015). Secondary analysis showed that all 5 RCCs were significantly associated with malnutrition. The only RCC associated with mortality was energy intake (odds ratio 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P = .008).
Conclusions
AND‐ASPEN criterion is a feasible and accurate method to recognize malnutrition and predict hospital mortality when applied by trained dietitians for the critical care trauma population. Further studies are needed considering patient subgroups such as obese and elderly.
Summary
Mortality and morbidity for high‐risk surgical patients are often high, especially in low‐resource settings. Enhanced peri‐operative care has the potential to reduce preventable deaths but must be designed to meet local needs. This before‐and‐after cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a postoperative 48‐hour enhanced care pathway for high‐risk surgical patients (‘high‐risk surgical bundle’) who did not meet the criteria for elective admission to intensive care. The pathway comprised of six elements: risk identification and communication; adoption of a high‐risk post‐anaesthesia care unit discharge checklist; prompt nursing admission to ward; intensification of vital signs monitoring; troponin measurement; and prompt access to medical support if required. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Data describing 1189 patients from two groups, before and after implementation of the pathway, were compared. The usual care group comprised a retrospective cohort of high‐risk surgical patients between September 2015 and December 2016. The intervention group prospectively included high‐risk surgical patients from February 2019 to March 2020. Unadjusted mortality rate was 10.5% (78/746) for the usual care and 6.3% (28/443) for the intervention group. After adjustment, the intervention effect remained significant (RR 0.46 (95%CI 0.30–0.72). The high‐risk surgical bundle group received more rapid response team calls (24% vs. 12.6%; RR 0.63 [95%CI 0.49–0.80]) and surgical re‐interventions (18.9 vs. 7.5%; RR 0.41 [95%CI 0.30–0.59]). These data suggest that a clinical pathway based on enhanced surveillance for high‐risk surgical patients in a resource‐constrained setting could reduce in‐hospital mortality.
Probiótico é uma palavra que deriva do latim e grego e significa "pró-vida" ou para vida, e existem várias definições desde a sua descoberta, são definidos como microrganismos vivos, que administrados em quantidades adequadas conferem benefícios à saúde do hospedeiro. Vários estudos têm descrito que os probióticos apresentam efeito imunoestimulador, pensa-se que este efeito pode estar associado a capacidade dos probióticos interagirem com as placas de Payer, presentes no intestino, que resulta na estimulação dos linfócitos B, produção de IgA, através da migração de linfócitos T para intestino, além disso tem sido demonstrado, que os probióticos favorecem a atividade
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.