Background and purpose On 11 March 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 infection a pandemic. The risk of ischemic stroke may be higher in patients with COVID-19 infection similar to those with other respiratory tract infections. We present a comprehensive set of practice implications in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. Methods The practice implications were prepared after review of data to reach the consensus among stroke experts from 18 countries. The writers used systematic literature reviews, reference to previously published stroke guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate practice implications. All members of the writing group had opportunities to comment in writing on the practice implications and approved the final version of this document. Results This document with consensus is divided into 18 sections. A total of 41 conclusions and practice implications have been developed. The document includes practice implications for evaluation of stroke patients with caution for stroke team members to avoid COVID-19 exposure, during clinical evaluation and performance of imaging and laboratory procedures with special considerations of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Conclusions These practice implications with consensus based on the currently available evidence aim to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who are suspected of, or confirmed, with COVID-19 infection. Under certain circumstances, however, only limited evidence is available to support these practice implications, suggesting an urgent need for establishing procedures for the management of stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.

In a follow-up to a 1-year study involving patients who had a TIA or minor stroke, the rate of cardiovascular events including stroke in a selected cohort was 6.4% in the first year and 6.4% in the second through fifth years. (Funded by AstraZeneca and others.).

Background and Purpose-The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of intracranial plaques and stenoses and their causal role in patients with fatal stroke. Intracranial atherosclerosis is considered to be a rare condition with a severe prognosis. However, disease prevalence may be underestimated due to lack of appropriate diagnostic procedures. Methods-We performed a systematic analysis of intra-and extracranial arteries, the aortic arch, and the heart in 339 consecutive autopsies of patients with stroke. Clinical history, risk factors, imaging data, and general autopsy reports were analyzed. Patients with brain hemorrhage (nϭ80) were used as control subjects. Results-Intracranial plaques and stenoses occurred in 62.2% (95% CI, 56.3 to 68.1) and 43.2% (95% CI, 37.2 to 49.3) of patients with brain infarction, respectively, compared with 48.8% (PϽ0.05) and 17.5% (PϽ0.001) of patients with brain hemorrhage, respectively. In the 43% of patients with brain infarction with at least one intracranial plaqueinducing luminal stenosis graded Ͼ30%, the stenosis was considered to be causal in 5.8% of cases (nϭ15) because of superimposed clot on ulcerated plaques; 27% of these patients had stenoses graded 30% to 75%. In multivariate analyses, diabetes and male sex were significantly associated with intracranial plaques and stenosis. History of myocardial infarction was significantly associated with intracranial plaques and previous stroke was associated with intracranial stenosis. Conclusions-Intracranial plaques and stenoses are highly prevalent in fatal stroke, and stenoses graded 30% to 75% may be causal. New arterial wall imaging techniques should be used to reevaluate the frequency and role of intracranial artery plaques in living patients with stroke.